Difference between revisions of "2006:Audio Music Similarity proposal"

From MIREX Wiki
(Audio Music Similarity proposal)
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-\[\[([A-Z][^:]+)\]\] +2006:\1))
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
== Description ==
 
== Description ==
 +
Evaluation of the content-based estimation of the similarity of two audio music examples. Discussion of the evaluation procedures on the [https://mail.lis.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/mrx-com00 MIREX 06 "AudioSim06" contest planning list] has been documented on the [[2006:Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval]] page. A full digest of the discussions is available to subscribers from the [https://mail.lis.uiuc.edu/mailman/private/mrx-com00/ MIREX 06 "AudioSim06" contest planning list archives].
 +
 +
Submissions will be required to estimate the similarity of each example, in a small music corpora, to each other example and will be evaluated according to a number of metrics, including metrics derived from the metadata available for the corpora (including the genre, artist and album labels) and runtime performance.
  
 
== Status ==
 
== Status ==
Line 34: Line 37:
  
 
== Test collections ==
 
== Test collections ==
 +
 +
* Magnatune? (MIREX'04 and MIREX'05)
 +
* Epitonic?
 +
* USPOP 2002? (MIREX'05)
  
 
== Potential Participants ==
 
== Potential Participants ==
 +
 +
* Elias Pampalk

Latest revision as of 13:11, 13 May 2010

Proposers

Title

Similarity estimation of Polyphonic Musical Audio

Description

Evaluation of the content-based estimation of the similarity of two audio music examples. Discussion of the evaluation procedures on the MIREX 06 "AudioSim06" contest planning list has been documented on the 2006:Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval page. A full digest of the discussions is available to subscribers from the MIREX 06 "AudioSim06" contest planning list archives.

Submissions will be required to estimate the similarity of each example, in a small music corpora, to each other example and will be evaluated according to a number of metrics, including metrics derived from the metadata available for the corpora (including the genre, artist and album labels) and runtime performance.

Status

Evaluation procedures

Evaluation metrics

Evaluator pseudo-code

Statistical Significance testing

Visualisation

Input data

Content

File formats

Output data

Content

File formats

Suggested calling formats for submitted algorithms

Maximum submission runtime

Test collections

  • Magnatune? (MIREX'04 and MIREX'05)
  • Epitonic?
  • USPOP 2002? (MIREX'05)

Potential Participants

  • Elias Pampalk