Search results

From MIREX Wiki

Page title matches

  • * [[2007:Best_Coding_Practices_for_MIREX|Programming Best Practices Guide]] * [[2007:MIREX_2007_Submission_Instructions|Submission Instructions]]
    1 KB (194 words) - 16:58, 13 May 2010

Page text matches

  • ==Welcome to MIREX 2021== ...bana-Champaign ([https://illinois.edu UIUC]) is the principal organizer of MIREX 2021.
    7 KB (1,112 words) - 13:16, 12 November 2021
  • ==Welcome to MIREX 2017== ...a-Champaign ([http://www.illinois.edu UIUC]) is the principal organizer of MIREX 2017.
    9 KB (1,363 words) - 12:20, 7 May 2018
  • ==MIREX 2010 Deadline Dates== We have two sets of deadlines for submissions. We have to stagger the deadlines because of runtime and human evaluation c
    9 KB (1,296 words) - 05:32, 6 June 2011
  • ...have been evaluated at ISMIR 2004, MIREX 2005, MIREX 2007, MIREX 2008 and MIREX 2009. However, there was no genre classification task in 2006. .... This year, however, we are asking that all discussions take place on the MIREX [https://mail.lis.illinois.edu/mailman/listinfo/evalfest "EvalFest" list].
    13 KB (2,010 words) - 22:47, 3 June 2010
  • Two datasets are used in this task, the MIREX 2006 US Pop Music Cover Song dataset Audio Cover Song dataset the [http://w .... This year, however, we are asking that all discussions take place on the MIREX [https://mail.lis.illinois.edu/mailman/listinfo/evalfest "EvalFest" list].
    10 KB (1,542 words) - 04:12, 5 June 2010
  • ...l Brossier and Pierre Leveau . It has subsequently been run in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009. The dataset will be the same as in 2005/2006/2007/2009 unless new or updated datasets are made available. The current dataset
    9 KB (1,361 words) - 04:20, 5 June 2010
  • Systems are supposed to print out the onset-offset times as opposed to MIREX 2008 chord output format where only onset were used. Submissions have to conform to the specified format below:
    12 KB (1,995 words) - 01:37, 15 December 2011
  • =MIREX 2006 RESULTS= ...Results]] page. The abstracts are also available [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2006/MIREX2006Abstracts.pdf here].
    7 KB (1,024 words) - 01:07, 15 December 2011
  • ...udio artist identifcation algorithms have been evaluated at ISMIR 2004 and MIREX 2005. However, there was no artist identification task in 2006. Related MIREX 2007 task proposals:
    8 KB (1,172 words) - 16:57, 13 May 2010
  • =FINAL 2007 AUDIO CLASSICAL COMPOSER IDENTIFICATION EVALUATION SCENARIO OVERVIEW= Do take a look at the [[2007:Audio Genre Classification]] task wiki as we are basing the underlying stru
    5 KB (751 words) - 16:57, 13 May 2010
  • ...d [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex2005/index.php/Audio_Genre_Classification MIREX 2005]. However, there was no genre classification task in 2006. Related MIREX 2007 task proposals:
    13 KB (1,934 words) - 16:57, 13 May 2010
  • ...hat audio music similarity and retrieval algorithms have been evaluated at MIREX 2006 ( [[2006:Audio_Music_Similarity_and_Retrieval]] ). Related MIREX 2007 task proposals:
    12 KB (1,800 words) - 16:57, 13 May 2010
  • ...e bottom of this page to force folks to thoroughly read through this MIREX 2007 instruction set. # Go read Andreas Ehmann's [[2007:Best Coding Practices for MIREX]].
    3 KB (455 words) - 16:58, 13 May 2010
  • =MIREX 2007 Results Posted= Results from the 2007 MIREX evaluation runs are available now at: [[2007:MIREX2007_Results]]!
    6 KB (748 words) - 22:56, 19 December 2011
  • ...mrx-com01 Score Following contest planning list] will be documented on the 2007:Score Following page. A full digest of the discussions is available to subs ...ing and realtime performance, also separated into two domains (upon enough submissions) for symbolic and audio systems. Note that we also do accept systems that
    2 KB (327 words) - 23:02, 19 December 2011
  • ...tion/MIREX/data/2007/multiF0/index.htm Development Set for MIREX 2007 MultiF0 Estimation Tracking Task]. ...score as described in [http://www.hindawi.com/GetArticle.aspx?doi=10.1155/2007/48317 Poliner and Ellis p.g. 5 ] will be calculated.
    14 KB (2,374 words) - 14:08, 7 June 2010
  • ...ing and realtime performance, also separated into two domains (upon enough submissions) for symbolic and audio systems. Note that we also do accept systems that * the proposed new score and reference file format is described here: [[2007:Score File Format]]
    5 KB (769 words) - 23:26, 19 December 2011
  • ==Welcome to MIREX 2009== ...rbana-Champaign ([http://www.uiuc.edu UIUC]) is the principal organizer of MIREX 2009.
    6 KB (923 words) - 16:52, 13 May 2010
  • ...ing and realtime performance, also separated into two domains (upon enough submissions) for symbolic and audio systems. Note that we also do accept systems that * the proposed new score and reference file format is described here: [[2007:Score File Format]]
    5 KB (812 words) - 23:26, 19 December 2011
  • ==Special Comments about Grading the Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval Submissions == ...n set (should take about 2-3 hours in total) by '''Thursday, 13 September, 2007''', please do not register. Each grader gets an exclusive list of items
    15 KB (2,552 words) - 22:23, 13 May 2010
  • ==Special Comments about Grading the Symbolic Melodic Similarity Submissions == ...tion set (should take about 2-3 hours in total) by Thursday, 13 September, 2007, please do not register. Each grader gets an exclusive list of items upo
    14 KB (2,372 words) - 22:23, 13 May 2010
  • ...tion/MIREX/data/2007/multiF0/index.htm Development Set for MIREX 2007 MultiF0 Estimation Tracking Task]. ...score as described in [http://www.hindawi.com/GetArticle.aspx?doi=10.1155/2007/48317 Poliner and Ellis p.g. 5 ] will be calculated.
    7 KB (1,105 words) - 05:37, 6 June 2011
  • The Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval task has been run in MIREX 2009, 2007, and 2006. ...usic_Similarity_and_Retrieval|Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval task in MIREX 2009]] || [[2009:Audio_Music_Similarity_and_Retrieval_Results|Results]]
    14 KB (2,146 words) - 20:17, 18 June 2010
  • ...first run at MIREX 2008 [[2008:Audio_Tag_Classification]] and as a special MIREX task at 2009 We wish to compare a number of treatments/systems (the submissions) over a number of blocks/rows. We can either compute average classification
    21 KB (2,997 words) - 14:06, 7 June 2010
  • ...arious audio classification tasks that follow this Train/Test process. For MIREX 2010, five classification sub-tasks are included: ...sks were conducted in previous MIREX runs (please see [[#Links to Previous MIREX Runs of These Classification Tasks]]). This page presents the evaluation of
    14 KB (1,932 words) - 11:15, 14 July 2010
  • ...ve been evaluated at ISMIR 2004 and MIREX 2005, MIREX 2007, MIREX 2008 and MIREX 2009. However, there was no artist identification task in 2006. Two collections are to be used at MIREX 2010. The collection used at MIREX 2009 will be re-used. Collection statistics:
    8 KB (1,151 words) - 06:23, 24 May 2010
  • ...od for building the ground truth as in the previous iterations in 2006 and 2007 will be used. This method has the advantage that no ground truth needs to b === Packaging submissions ===
    5 KB (705 words) - 16:25, 16 December 2010
  • The 2010 SMS task replicates the 2007 task. After the algorithms have been submitted, their results will be poole ...rmation, do take a look at the [[2007:Symbolic_Melodic_Similarity_Results |2007 SMS Results Page]].
    5 KB (848 words) - 13:26, 14 July 2010
  • ...first run at MIREX 2008 [[2008:Audio_Tag_Classification]] and as a special MIREX task at 2009 Below is the task description from MIREX 2008.
    26 KB (3,980 words) - 23:36, 19 December 2011
  • ==Welcome to MIREX 2011== ...a-Champaign ([http://www.illinois.edu UIUC]) is the principal organizer of MIREX 2011.
    8 KB (1,099 words) - 14:31, 1 October 2011
  • Systems are supposed to print out the onset-offset times as opposed to MIREX 2008 chord output format where only onset were used. Submissions have to conform to the specified format below:
    13 KB (2,035 words) - 01:37, 15 December 2011
  • ...udio Music Similarity and Retrieval task has been run in MIREX 2010, 2009, 2007, and 2006. ...usic_Similarity_and_Retrieval|Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval task in MIREX 2010]] || [[2010:Audio_Music_Similarity_and_Retrieval_Results|Results]]
    14 KB (2,155 words) - 08:02, 4 September 2011
  • ...udio Music Similarity and Retrieval task has been run in MIREX 2010, 2009, 2007, and 2006. ...usic_Similarity_and_Retrieval|Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval task in MIREX 2010]] || [[2010:Audio_Music_Similarity_and_Retrieval_Results|Results]]
    5 KB (839 words) - 11:09, 25 August 2010
  • ...MIREX. We would appreciate it greatly if you would post comments about how MIREX has impacted or influenced your work directly or MIR research in general. ...s to MIREX-related papers as further evidence of impact for MIREX on the [[MIREX Impact Citations]] page.
    5 KB (775 words) - 14:14, 22 May 2011
  • Two datasets are used in this task, the MIREX 2006 US Pop Music Cover Song dataset Audio Cover Song dataset the [http://w .... This year, however, we are asking that all discussions take place on the MIREX [https://mail.lis.illinois.edu/mailman/listinfo/evalfest "EvalFest" list].
    10 KB (1,529 words) - 15:02, 8 July 2011
  • ...first run at MIREX 2008 [[2008:Audio_Tag_Classification]] and as a special MIREX task at 2009 .... This year, however, we are asking that all discussions take place on the MIREX [https://mail.lis.illinois.edu/mailman/listinfo/evalfest "EvalFest" list].
    21 KB (2,982 words) - 15:43, 8 July 2011
  • ...arious audio classification tasks that follow this Train/Test process. For MIREX 2011, five classification sub-tasks are included: All five classification tasks were conducted in previous MIREX runs (please see ). This page presents the evaluation of these tasks, inclu
    13 KB (1,875 words) - 15:48, 8 July 2011
  • The 2011 SMS task replicates the 2007 task. After the algorithms have been submitted, their results will be poole ...rmation, do take a look at the [[2007:Symbolic_Melodic_Similarity_Results |2007 SMS Results Page]].
    6 KB (855 words) - 14:10, 8 July 2011
  • ...l Brossier and Pierre Leveau . It has subsequently been run in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009. The dataset will be the same as in 2005/2006/2007/2009 unless new or updated datasets are made available. The current dataset
    9 KB (1,363 words) - 14:11, 8 July 2011
  • .... This year, however, we are asking that all discussions take place on the MIREX [https://mail.lis.illinois.edu/mailman/listinfo/evalfest "EvalFest" list]. ...tion/MIREX/data/2007/multiF0/index.htm Development Set for MIREX 2007 MultiF0 Estimation Tracking Task].
    7 KB (1,161 words) - 03:43, 15 August 2011
  • ...the participants. Any and all topics, suggestions, gripes, etc. related to MIREX are not only welcomed, they are encouraged. ...as of 11 April, 2007) that we will only be able to support MATLAB and JAVA submissions but this might be subject to change. Fool around with the preliminary proto
    9 KB (1,385 words) - 01:47, 15 December 2011
  • Note that audio tag classification is a new task at MIREX 2008. We wish to compare a number of treatments/systems (the submissions) over a number of blocks/rows. We can either compute average classification
    22 KB (3,434 words) - 23:39, 19 December 2011
  • ...arious audio classification tasks that follow this Train/Test process. For MIREX 2012, five classification sub-tasks are included: All five classification tasks were conducted in previous MIREX runs (please see ). This page presents the evaluation of these tasks, inclu
    11 KB (1,608 words) - 16:39, 7 June 2012
  • Two datasets are used in this task, the MIREX 2006 US Pop Music Cover Song dataset Audio Cover Song dataset the [http://w .... This year, however, we are asking that all discussions take place on the MIREX [https://mail.lis.illinois.edu/mailman/listinfo/evalfest "EvalFest" list].
    10 KB (1,517 words) - 16:30, 7 June 2012
  • ...first run at MIREX 2008 [[2008:Audio_Tag_Classification]] and as a special MIREX task at 2009 .... This year, however, we are asking that all discussions take place on the MIREX [https://mail.lis.illinois.edu/mailman/listinfo/evalfest "EvalFest" list].
    21 KB (2,970 words) - 16:30, 7 June 2012
  • ...udio Music Similarity and Retrieval task has been run in MIREX 2010, 2009, 2007, and 2006. ...usic_Similarity_and_Retrieval|Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval task in MIREX 2010]] || [[2010:Audio_Music_Similarity_and_Retrieval_Results|Results]]
    14 KB (2,143 words) - 16:31, 7 June 2012
  • The 2012 SMS task replicates the 2007 task. After the algorithms have been submitted, their results will be poole ...rmation, do take a look at the [[2007:Symbolic_Melodic_Similarity_Results |2007 SMS Results Page]].
    5 KB (843 words) - 16:31, 7 June 2012
  • ...l Brossier and Pierre Leveau . It has subsequently been run in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2011. The dataset will be the same as in 2005/2006/2007/2009 unless new or updated datasets are made available. The current dataset
    9 KB (1,351 words) - 16:32, 7 June 2012
  • .... This year, however, we are asking that all discussions take place on the MIREX [https://mail.lis.illinois.edu/mailman/listinfo/evalfest "EvalFest" list]. ...tion/MIREX/data/2007/multiF0/index.htm Development Set for MIREX 2007 MultiF0 Estimation Tracking Task].
    7 KB (1,168 words) - 08:52, 27 August 2012
  • Systems are supposed to print out the onset-offset times as opposed to MIREX 2008 chord output format where only onset were used. Submissions have to conform to the specified format below:
    14 KB (2,188 words) - 11:48, 27 August 2012

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)