Difference between revisions of "2005:Audio Artist Identification Results"

From MIREX Wiki
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Goal: To identify artist from music audio (in PCM format).
+
==Introduction==
 +
These are the results for the 2005 running of the Audio Artist Identification task.  
  
−
Dataset: Two sets of data were used: Magnatune and USPOP. The audio sampling rates used were either 44.1 KHz or 22.05 KHz (mono). More data information is in the following table.
+
===Goal===
 +
To identify artist from music audio (in PCM format).
  
 +
===Datasets===
 +
Two sets of data were used: Magnatune and USPOP. The audio sampling rates used were either 44.1 KHz or 22.05 KHz (mono). More data information is in the following table.
  
−
 
+
{| border="1" cellspacing="0"
−
{| border="1"
 
 
|- style="background: yellow;"
 
|- style="background: yellow;"
 
! Dataset !! Size (@ 44.1 KHz) !! Number of Training Files !! Number of Testing Files
 
! Dataset !! Size (@ 44.1 KHz) !! Number of Training Files !! Number of Testing Files
Line 15: Line 18:
 
| 37.3 GB || 1158 || 653
 
| 37.3 GB || 1158 || 653
 
|}
 
|}
−
<br>
+
 
−
<br>
+
==Results==
−
{| border="1"
+
 
 +
===Overall===
 +
{| border="1" cellspacing="0"
 
|- style="background: yellow; text-align: center;"
 
|- style="background: yellow; text-align: center;"
 
! colspan="3" | OVERALL  
 
! colspan="3" | OVERALL  
 
|-style="background: yellow;"
 
|-style="background: yellow;"
−
! Rank !! Participant !! Mean of Magnatune Raw Classification Accuracy and USPOP Raw Classification Accuracy   
+
! Rank !! Participant !! Mean of Magnatune Raw Classification Accuracy <br> and USPOP Raw Classification Accuracy   
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 1 || Mandel & Ellis || 72.45%  
+
| 1 ||[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/mandel.pdf Mandel & Ellis] || 72.45%  
 
|-
 
|-
−
|2 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) || 68.57%  
+
|2 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/bergstra.pdf Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1)] || 68.57%  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 3 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) || 66.71%
+
| 3 ||[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/bergstra Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2)] || 66.71%
 
|-  
 
|-  
−
| 4 || Pampalk, E. || 61.28%
+
| 4 ||[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/pampalk.pdf Pampalk, E.] || 61.28%
 
|-  
 
|-  
 
| 5 || West & Lamere || 47.24%
 
| 5 || West & Lamere || 47.24%
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 6 || Tzanetakis, G. || 42.05%
+
| 6 ||[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/tzanetakis.pdf Tzanetakis, G.] || 42.05%
 
|-  
 
|-  
−
| 7 || Logan, B || 25.95%  
+
| 7 ||[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/logan.pdf Logan, B] || 25.95%  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
−
<br>
+
 
−
{| border="1"
+
===Magnatune Dataset===
 +
{| border="1" cellspacing="0"
 
|- style="background: yellow; text-align: center;"
 
|- style="background: yellow; text-align: center;"
 
! colspan="7" | Magnatune Dataset  
 
! colspan="7" | Magnatune Dataset  
 
|-style="background: yellow;"  
 
|-style="background: yellow;"  
−
! Rank !! Participant !! Raw Classification Accuracy !! Normalized Raw lassification Accuracy !! Runtime (s) !! Machine !! Confusion Matrix Files
+
! Rank !! Participant !! Raw Classification Accuracy !! Normalized Raw Classification Accuracy !! Runtime (s) !! Machine !! Confusion Matrix Files
 
|-  
 
|-  
−
| 1 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) || 77.26% || 79.64% || 24 hours || B0 || BCE_1_MTeval.txt
+
| 1 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) || 77.26% || 79.64% || 24 hours || B0 ||[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/BCE_1_MTeval.txt BCE_1_MTeval.txt]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 2 || Mandel & Ellis || 76.60% || 76.62% || 11073 || R || ME_MTeval.txt  
+
| 2 || Mandel & Ellis || 76.60% || 76.62% || 11073 || R || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/ME_MTeval.txt ME_MTeval.txt]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 3 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) || 74.45% || 74.51% || -- || -- || BCE_2_MTeval.txt  
+
| 3 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) || 74.45% || 74.51% || -- || -- || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/BCE_2_MTeval.txt BCE_2_MTeval.txt]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 4 || Pampalk, E. || 66.36% || 66.48% || 4272 || B1 || P_MTeval.txt
+
| 4 || Pampalk, E. || 66.36% || 66.48% || 4272 || B1 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/P_MTeval.txt P_MTeval.txt]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 5 || Tzanetakis, G. || 55.45% || 55.59% || 2632 || B0 || T_MTeval.txt
+
| 5 || Tzanetakis, G. || 55.45% || 55.59% || 2632 || B0 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/T_MTeval.txt T_MTeval.txt]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 6 || West & Lamere || 53.43% || 53.48% || 27480 || B3 || WL_MTeval.txt  
+
| 6 || West & Lamere || 53.43% || 53.48% || 27480 || B3 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/WL_MTeval.txt WL_MTeval.txt]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 7 || Logan, B || 37.07% || 37.10% || N/A || B3 || L_MTeval.txt  
+
| 7 || Logan, B || 37.07% || 37.10% || N/A || B3 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/L_MTeval.txt L_MTeval.txt]
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (SSD+RH) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || -- ||
+
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (SSD+RH) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || --  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || -- ||
+
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || --  
 
|-
 
|-
−
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD+RH) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || -- ||
+
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD+RH) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || --  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
===USPOP Dataset===
 +
{| border="1" cellspacing="0"
 +
|- style="background: yellow; text-align: center;"
 +
! colspan="7" | USPOP Dataset 
 +
|-style="background: yellow;"
 +
! Rank !! Participant !! Raw Classification Accuracy !! Normalized Raw Classification Accuracy !! Runtime (s) !! Machine !! Confusion Matrix Files
 +
|-
 +
| 1 || Mandel & Ellis || 68.30% || 67.96% || 10240 || R || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/ME_USeval.txt ME_USeval.txt]
 +
|-
 +
| 2 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) || 59.88% || 60.90% || 24 Hours || B0 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/BCE_1_USeval.txt ME_USeval.txt]
 +
|-
 +
| 3 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) || 58.96% || 58.96% || -- || -- || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/BCE_2_USeval.txt BCE_2_USeval.txt]
 +
|-
 +
| 4 || Pampalk, E. || 56.20% || 56.03% || 4321 || B1 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/P_USeval.txt P_USeval.txt]
 +
|-
 +
| 5 || West & Lamere || 41.04% || 41.00% || 26871 || B3 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/WL_USeval.txt WL_USeval.txt]
 +
|-
 +
| 6 || Tzanetakis, G. || 28.64% || 28.48% || 2443 || B0 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/T_USeval.txt T_USeval.txt]
 +
|-
 +
| 7 || Logan, B. || 14.83% || 14.76% || N/A || B3 || [https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/audio-artist/L_USeval.txt L_USeval.txt]
 +
|-
 +
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (SSD+RH) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || --
 +
|-
 +
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || --
 +
|-
 +
| 8 || Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD+RH) || TO * || -- || -- || -- || --
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
<br>
 +
'''Note:'''
 +
DNC: did not complete ( error in execution).
 +
TO: timed out (did not complete within 24 hours).

Latest revision as of 11:23, 2 August 2010

Introduction

These are the results for the 2005 running of the Audio Artist Identification task.

Goal

To identify artist from music audio (in PCM format).

Datasets

Two sets of data were used: Magnatune and USPOP. The audio sampling rates used were either 44.1 KHz or 22.05 KHz (mono). More data information is in the following table.

Dataset Size (@ 44.1 KHz) Number of Training Files Number of Testing Files
Magnatune 35.2 GB 1158 642
USPOP 37.3 GB 1158 653

Results

Overall

OVERALL
Rank Participant Mean of Magnatune Raw Classification Accuracy
and USPOP Raw Classification Accuracy
1 Mandel & Ellis 72.45%
2 Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) 68.57%
3 Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) 66.71%
4 Pampalk, E. 61.28%
5 West & Lamere 47.24%
6 Tzanetakis, G. 42.05%
7 Logan, B 25.95%

Magnatune Dataset

Magnatune Dataset
Rank Participant Raw Classification Accuracy Normalized Raw Classification Accuracy Runtime (s) Machine Confusion Matrix Files
1 Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) 77.26% 79.64% 24 hours B0 BCE_1_MTeval.txt
2 Mandel & Ellis 76.60% 76.62% 11073 R ME_MTeval.txt
3 Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) 74.45% 74.51% -- -- BCE_2_MTeval.txt
4 Pampalk, E. 66.36% 66.48% 4272 B1 P_MTeval.txt
5 Tzanetakis, G. 55.45% 55.59% 2632 B0 T_MTeval.txt
6 West & Lamere 53.43% 53.48% 27480 B3 WL_MTeval.txt
7 Logan, B 37.07% 37.10% N/A B3 L_MTeval.txt
8 Lidy & Rauber (SSD+RH) TO * -- -- -- --
8 Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD) TO * -- -- -- --
8 Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD+RH) TO * -- -- -- --

USPOP Dataset

USPOP Dataset
Rank Participant Raw Classification Accuracy Normalized Raw Classification Accuracy Runtime (s) Machine Confusion Matrix Files
1 Mandel & Ellis 68.30% 67.96% 10240 R ME_USeval.txt
2 Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) 59.88% 60.90% 24 Hours B0 ME_USeval.txt
3 Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) 58.96% 58.96% -- -- BCE_2_USeval.txt
4 Pampalk, E. 56.20% 56.03% 4321 B1 P_USeval.txt
5 West & Lamere 41.04% 41.00% 26871 B3 WL_USeval.txt
6 Tzanetakis, G. 28.64% 28.48% 2443 B0 T_USeval.txt
7 Logan, B. 14.83% 14.76% N/A B3 L_USeval.txt
8 Lidy & Rauber (SSD+RH) TO * -- -- -- --
8 Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD) TO * -- -- -- --
8 Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD+RH) TO * -- -- -- --


Note: DNC: did not complete ( error in execution). TO: timed out (did not complete within 24 hours).

Retrieved from "https://music-ir.org/mirex/w/index.php?title=2005:Audio_Artist_Identification_Results&oldid=7589"