2021:Lyrics Transcription (former: Automatic Lyrics-to-Audio Alignment)
Contents
Description
This year we host the MIREX2021: Automatic Lyrics Transcription challenge. You are free to participate in one of the tasks or both of them.
The task of Lyrics Transcription aims to identify the words from sung utterances, in the same way as in automatic speech recognition. This can be mathematically expressed as follows:
Prediction(w) = argmax P(w|X)
where w and X are the word and acoustic features respectively.
Ideally, the lyrics transcriber should return meaningful word sequences:
Prediction(w) = [ <w_1>, <w_2>, ..., <w_N> ]
The algorithm receives either monophonic singing performances or a polyphonic mix (singing voice + musical accompaniment). Both cases are evaluated separately in this challenge.
Submission Format
Submissions should be packaged in a compressed file (.zip or .rar, etc.) which contains at least two files:
A) The main transcription script
The main transcription script to execute. This should be a one-line executable in one of the following formats: a bash (.sh) a python (.py) script, or a binary file.
I / O
The submitted algorithm must take as arguments an audio file and the full output path to save the transcriptions. The ability to specify the output path and file name is essential.
Denoting the input audio filename path as $[input_audio_path} and the output file path and name as ${output}, a program called `foobar' will be called from the command-line as follows:
foobar ${input_audio_path} ${output}
OR with flags:
foobar -i ${input_audio_path} -o ${output}
Input Audio
Participating algorithms will have to receive the following input format:
- Audio format : WAV / MP3
- CD-quality (PCM, 16-bit, 44100 Hz)
- single channel (mono) for a cappella (Hansen) and two channels for original
Output File Format
A text file (per song) containing list of words separated by white space:
<word_1> <word_2> ... <word_N>
Any non-word items (e.g. silence, music, noise or end of the sentence tokens) should be removed from the final output.
This file should ideally be located at:
${output}/${input_song_id}.txt
B) The README file
This file must contain detailed installation instructions, the use of the main script and contact information.
Any submission that is failed to meet above requirements will not be considered in evaluation!
Training Datasets
Datasets within automatic lyrics transcription research can be categorised under two domains in regards to the presence of music instruments accompanying the singer: Monophonic and polyphonic datasets.
The former is considered to have only one singer singing the lyrics, and the latter is when there is music accompaniment.
In this challenge, the participants are encouraged but not obliged to use the open source datasets below, which are also commonly used in the literature for benchmarking ALT results:
DAMP dataset
The DAMP - Sing!300x30x2 dataset which consists of solo singing recordings (monophonic) performed by amateur singers, collected via a mobile Karaoke application. The data is curated to be gender-wise balanced and contains performers from 30 different countries, which introduces a good amount of variability in terms of accents and pronunciation. list of recordings. For more details see the paper.
- The audio can be downloaded from the Smule web site
- Lyrics boundary annotations can be generated from raw annotations using this repository.
- Or annotations can be directly retrieved in the Kaldi form here
DALI Dataset
DALI (a large Dataset of synchronised Audio, LyrIcs and notes) is the benchmark dataset for building an acoustic model on polyphonic recordings and it contains over 5000 songs with semi-automatically aligned lyrics annotations. The songs are commercial recordings in full-duration, whereas the lyrics are described according to different levels of granularity including words and notes (and syllables underlying a given note). For each song DALI provides a link to a matched youtube video, from which the audio could be retrieved.
- For more details how, see its full description here.
Evaluation Datasets
The following datasets are used for evaluation and so cannot be used by participants to train their models under any circumstance.
Note that the evaluation sets listed below consist of popular songs in English language, and have overlapping samples with DALI. In case using DALI for training, you MUST exclude the songs listed above in training the model for a scientific evaluation.
Hansen's Dataset
The dataset contains 9 pop music songs released in early 2010s.
The audio has two versions: the original mix with instrumental accompaniment and a cappella singing voice only one. An example song can be seen here.
You can read in detail about how the dataset was made here: Recognition of Phonemes in A-cappella Recordings using Temporal Patterns and Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients. The recordings have been provided by Jens Kofod Hansen for public evaluation.
- file duration up to 4:40 minutes (total time: 35:33 minutes)
- 3590 words annotated in total
Mauch's Dataset
The dataset contains 20 pop music songs with annotations of beginning-timestamps of each word. The audio has instrumental accompaniment. An example song can be seen here.
You can read in detail about how the dataset was used for the first time here: Integrating Additional Chord Information Into HMM-Based Lyrics-to-Audio Alignment. The dataset has been kindly provided by Sungkyun Chang.
- file duration up to 5:40 minutes (total time: 1h 19m)
- 5050 words annotated in total
Jamendo Dataset
This dataset contains 20 recordings with varying Western music genres, annotated with start-of-word timestamps. All songs have instrumental accompaniment.
It is available online on Github, although note that we do not allow tuning model parameters using this data, it can only be used to gain insight into the general structure of the test data. For more information also refer to this paper.
- file duration up to 4:43 (total time: 1h 12m)
- 5677 words annotated in total
Evaluation
Word Error Rate (WER) : the standard metric use in Automatic Speech Recognition.
WER = (S + I + D) / (C + S + I + D)
where;
C : correctly predicted words S : substitution errors I : insertion errors D : deletion errors
Character Error Rate (CER) : the above computation can also be done on the character level. This metric penalises the partially correctly predicted / incorrectly spelled words less than WER.
Submission closing dates
Closing date: December 9, 2021
Questions?
- send us an email - e.demirel@qmul.ac.uk (Emir Demirel) or info@voicemagix.com (Georgi Dzhambazov)
Potential Participants
Chitralekha Gupta
Emir Demirel
Gerardo Roa Dabike
Jiawen Huang
Bibliography
Stoller, D. and Durand, S. and Ewert, S. (2019) End-to-end Lyrics Alignment for Polyphonic Music Using An Audio-to-Character Recognition Model. ICASSP 2019.
Mauch, M., Fujihara, H., & Goto, M. (2012). Integrating additional chord information into HMM-based lyrics-to-audio alignment. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20(1), 200-210.
