2018:Patterns for Prediction Results
Contents
Introduction
In brief:
We look for
(1) Algorithms that take an excerpt of music as input (the prime), and output a predicted continuation of the excerpt.
(2) Additionally or alternatively, algorithms that take a prime and one or more continuations as input, and output the likelihood that each continuation is the genuine extension of the prime.
In more detail: One facet of human nature comprises the tendency to form predictions about what will happen in the future (Huron, 2006). Music, consisting of complex temporally extended sequences, provides an excellent setting for the study of prediction, and this topic has received attention from fields including but not limited to psychology (Collins, Tillmann, et al., 2014; Janssen, Burgoyne and Honing, 2017; Schellenberg, 1997; Schmukler, 1989), neuroscience (Koelsch et al., 2005), music theory (Gjerdingen, 2007; Lerdahl & Jackendoff, 1983; Rohrmeier & Pearce, 2018), music informatics (Conklin & Witten, 1995; Cherla et al., 2013), and machine learning (Elmsley, Weyde, & Armstrong, 2017; Hadjeres, Pachet, & Nielsen, 2016; Gjerdingen, 1989; Roberts et al., 2018; Sturm et al., 2016). In particular, we are interested in the way exact and inexact repetition occurs over the short, medium, and long term in pieces of music (Margulis, 2014; Widmer, 2016), and how these repetitions may interact with "schematic, veridical, dynamic, and conscious" expectations (Huron, 2006) in order to form a basis for successful prediction.
We call for algorithms that may model such expectations so as to predict the next musical events based on given, foregoing events (the prime). We invite contributions from all fields mentioned above (not just pattern discovery researchers), as different approaches may be complementary in terms of predicting correct continuations of a musical excerpt. We would like to explore these various approaches to music prediction in a MIREX task. For subtask (1) above (see "In brief"), the development and test datasets will contain an excerpt of a piece up until a cut-off point, after which the algorithm is supposed to generate the next N musical events up until 10 quarter-note beats, and we will quantitatively evaluate the extent to which an algorithm's continuation corresponds to the genuine continuation of the piece. For subtask (2), in addition to containing a prime, the development and test datasets will also contain continuations of the prime, one of which will be genuine, and the algorithm should rate the likelihood that each continuation is the genuine extension of the prime, which again will be evaluated quantitatively.
What is the relationship between pattern discovery and prediction? The last five years have seen an increasing interest in algorithms that discover or generate patterned data, leveraging methods beyond typical (e.g., Markovian) limits (Collins & Laney, 2017; MIREX Discovery of Repeated Themes & Sections task; Janssen, van Kranenburg and Volk, 2017; Ren et al., 2017; Widmer, 2016). One of the observations to emerge from the above-mentioned MIREX pattern discovery task is that an algorithm that is "good" at discovering patterns ought to be extendable to make "good" predictions for what will happen next in a given music excerpt (Meredith, 2013). Furthermore, evaluating the ability to predict may provide a stronger (or at least complementary) evaluation of an algorithm's pattern discovery capabilities, compared to evaluating its output against expert-annotated patterns, where the notion of "ground truth" has been debated (Meredith, 2013).
Contribution
...
For a more detailed introduction to the task, please see 2018:Patterns for Prediction.
Datasets and Algorithms
The training datasets were...
Submissions to the symMono and symPoly variants of the task are listed in Table 1. There were no submissions to the audMono or audPoly variants of the task this year. The task captains prepared a first-order Markov model (MM) over a state space of measure beat and key-centralized MIDI note number. This enabled evaluation of the implicit subtask, and can also serve as a point of comparison for the explicit task. It should be noted, however, that this model had access to the full song/piece – not just the prime – so it is at an advantage compared to EN1 and FC1 in the explicit task.
| Sub code | Submission name | Abstract | Contributors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Task Version | symMono | ||
| EN1 | Algo name here | Eric Nichols | |
| FC1 | Algo name here | Florian Colombo | |
| MM | Markov model | N/A | For purposes of comparison |
| Task Version | symPoly | ||
| FC1 | Algo name here | Florian Colombo | |
| MM | Markov model | N/A | For purposes of comparison |
Table 1. Algorithms submitted to Patterns for Prediction 2018.
(DESCRIBE SUBMISSIONS EN1 AND FC1 BRIEFLY HERE.)
Results
An intro spiel here...
(For mathematical definitions of the various metrics, please see 2018:Patterns_for_Prediction#Evaluation_Procedure.)
SymMono
Here are some results (cf. Figures 1-3), and some interpretation. Don't forget these as well (Figures 4-6), showing something.
Remarks on runtime appropriate here too.
SymPoly
And so on.
Discussion
...
Berit Janssen, Iris Ren, Tom Collins.
Figures
SymMono
Figure 1. Establishment recall averaged over each piece/movement. Establishment recall answers the following question. On average, how similar is the most similar algorithm-output pattern to a ground-truth pattern prototype?
Figure 2. Establishment precision averaged over each piece/movement. Establishment precision answers the following question. On average, how similar is the most similar ground-truth pattern prototype to an algorithm-output pattern?
SymPoly
Figure 12. Establishment recall averaged over each piece/movement. Establishment recall answers the following question. On average, how similar is the most similar algorithm-output pattern to a ground-truth pattern prototype?
Figure 13. Establishment precision averaged over each piece/movement. Establishment precision answers the following question. On average, how similar is the most similar ground-truth pattern prototype to an algorithm-output pattern?
Tables
SymMono
Click to download SymMono pattern retrieval results table
Click to download SymMono compression results table
