Search results
From MIREX Wiki
Page title matches
- These are the results for the 2014 running of the Singing Voice Separation task set. The evaluati === Summary Results ===6 KB (746 words) - 03:42, 3 August 2016
- These are the results for the 2014 running of the Audio Fingerprinting task. For background infor ==Summary Results==3 KB (439 words) - 02:59, 30 October 2014
- #REDIRECT [[2014:Audio Chord Estimation Results]]49 bytes (5 words) - 12:51, 31 October 2014
- = Results = |+ Results ballroom dataset4 KB (346 words) - 04:27, 10 October 2015
- = Results = |+ Results ballroom dataset3 KB (309 words) - 00:18, 7 October 2015
- These are the results for the 2015 running of the Singing Voice Separation task set. The evaluati === Summary Results ===3 KB (406 words) - 03:42, 3 August 2016
- These are the results for the 2015 running of the Music/Speech Classification and Detection task. ===Individual Results Files for Task 1===9 KB (1,045 words) - 08:20, 25 February 2016
- These are the results for the 2015 running of the Audio Fingerprinting task. For background infor ==Summary Results==4 KB (499 words) - 23:49, 13 July 2016
- ==Results by Task == ==OVERALL RESULTS POSTERS <!--(First Version: Will need updating as last runs are completed)-6 KB (750 words) - 10:20, 26 October 2015
- These are the results for the 2008 running of the Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation and T262 bytes (34 words) - 21:16, 19 October 2015
- ===MF0E Overall Summary Results=== ====Detailed Results====10 KB (1,517 words) - 10:25, 20 October 2015
- These are the results for the 2015 running of the Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation and T ===MF0E Overall Summary Results===10 KB (1,516 words) - 01:20, 22 October 2015
- == Results in Brief == ...h>, Bonferroni-corrected), but we should note that the decision to average results for OL1 on piece 5 could be driving this result. It should also be noted th24 KB (3,413 words) - 09:15, 21 October 2015
- == Results == ====Summary Results====4 KB (586 words) - 23:06, 20 October 2015
- These are the results for the 2015 running of the Real-time Audio to Score Alignment (a.k.a Score [[Category: Results]]2 KB (284 words) - 18:45, 27 October 2015
- These are the results for the 2015 running of the Symbolic Melodic Similarity task set. For backg For each query (and its 4 mutations), the returned results (candidates) from all systems were then grouped together (query set) for ev5 KB (728 words) - 20:36, 20 October 2015
- == Results == [[Category: Results]]6 KB (528 words) - 02:35, 21 October 2015
- ...hird one since the reorganization of the evaluation procedure in 2013. The results can therefore be directly compared to those of the last two years. Chord la ...has been withheld for the time being. Also the file names in the per track results have been anonymized.5 KB (715 words) - 17:32, 22 October 2015
- ==Overall Results Poster <!--(First Version: Will need updating as last runs are completed)-- ...w.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2016/mirex_2016_poster.pdf MIREX 2016 Overall Results Posters (PDF)]5 KB (737 words) - 08:07, 11 August 2016
- ==Overall Results Poster== ...w.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2017/mirex_2017_poster.pdf MIREX 2017 Overall Results Posters (PDF)]4 KB (517 words) - 11:20, 26 April 2018
Page text matches
- These are the results for the 2008 running of the Query-by-Singing/Humming task. For background i '''Task 1 [[#Task 1 Results|Goto Task 1 Results]]''': The first subtask is the same as last year. In this subtask, submitte7 KB (981 words) - 11:14, 23 October 2011
- These are the results for the 2011 running of the Query-by-tappingn task. For background informat '''Task 1 [[#Task 1 Results|Goto Task 1 Results]]''': The first subtask is the same as last year. In this subtask, submitte4 KB (546 words) - 13:32, 31 October 2011
- These are the results for the 2008 running of the Real-time Audio to Score Alignment (a.k.a Score [[Category: Results]]2 KB (215 words) - 17:17, 21 October 2011
- These are the results for the 2011 running of the Symbolic Melodic Similarity task set. For backg For each query (and its 4 mutations), the returned results (candidates) from all systems were then grouped together (query set) for ev7 KB (937 words) - 12:30, 4 November 2011
- == Results == ====Summary Results====5 KB (702 words) - 00:25, 6 November 2011
- These are the results for the 2011 running of the Audio Music Similarity and Retrieval task set. ...rom the same artist were also omitted). Then, for each query, the returned results (candidates) from all participants were grouped and were evaluated by human12 KB (1,723 words) - 23:29, 21 October 2011
- These are the results for the 2008 running of the Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation and T ===MF0E Overall Summary Results===10 KB (1,523 words) - 15:03, 15 November 2011
- ...me publications are available on this topic [1,2,3,4,5], comparison of the results is difficult, because different measures are used to assess the performance ''doChordID.sh "/path/to/testFileList.txt" "/path/to/scratch/dir" "/path/to/results/dir" ''26 KB (4,204 words) - 01:44, 15 December 2011
- ...n a query and a set of source data, produce an ordered list of songs. The results are evaluated against a ground truth derived from a second source or human1 KB (176 words) - 23:37, 19 December 2011
- ...valuation. This is an oft used approach at TREC when considering retrieval results (where each query is of equal importance, but unequal variance/difficulty). ...mer Honestly Significant Difference multiple comparisons are made over the results of Friedman's ANOVA as this (and other tests, such as multiply applied Stud22 KB (3,434 words) - 23:39, 19 December 2011
- 1. How many results should be written into the output file per query? I suggest 10, but this is ...me number of candidates, and just as Christian Sailer's suggestion, top 10 results is quite reasonable. So we could avoid some potential difficulty in result13 KB (2,111 words) - 23:41, 19 December 2011
- ...the same collection (althought the distinction should be indicated in the results. ...ithms. A more useful alternative may be the trimmed mean (remove 1 - 2% of results from both ends of each distribution then calculate mean). It has also been20 KB (3,177 words) - 23:52, 19 December 2011
- ...ost the final versions of the extended abstracts as part of the MIREX 2010 results page.4 KB (726 words) - 10:34, 2 August 2012
- ...ost the final versions of the extended abstracts as part of the MIREX 2012 results page.4 KB (734 words) - 15:48, 1 August 2012
- '''Example: /path/to/coversong/results/submission_id.txt'''10 KB (1,517 words) - 16:30, 7 June 2012
- ...are evaluated on their performance at tag classification using F-measure. Results are also reported for simple accuracy, however, as this statistic is domina ...ed approach at TREC (Text Retrieval Conference) when considering retrieval results (where each query is of equal importance, but unequal variance/difficulty).21 KB (2,970 words) - 16:30, 7 June 2012
- ...ask in MIREX 2010]] || [[2010:Audio_Music_Similarity_and_Retrieval_Results|Results]] ...ask in MIREX 2009]] || [[2009:Audio_Music_Similarity_and_Retrieval_Results|Results]]14 KB (2,143 words) - 16:31, 7 June 2012
- ...replicates the 2007 task. After the algorithms have been submitted, their results will be pooled for every query, and human evaluators, using the Evalutron 6 For each query (and its four mutations), the returned results (candidates) from all systems will be anonymously grouped together (query s5 KB (843 words) - 16:31, 7 June 2012
- ...voiced (Ground Truth or Detected values != 0) and unvoiced (GT, Det == 0) results, where the counts are: ...d no unvoiced frames, averaging over the excerpts can give some misleading results.10 KB (1,652 words) - 03:14, 28 August 2012
- ...me publications are available on this topic [1,2,3,4,5], comparison of the results is difficult, because different measures are used to assess the performance ''doChordID.sh "/path/to/testFileList.txt" "/path/to/scratch/dir" "/path/to/results/dir" ''14 KB (2,188 words) - 11:48, 27 August 2012