Difference between revisions of "2005:Symbolic Genre Classification Results"
From MIREX Wiki
(→Overall) |
(→38 Classes) |
||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
===38 Classes=== | ===38 Classes=== | ||
− | {| border="1" | + | {| border="1" cellspacing="0" |
|- style="background: yellow; text-align: center;" | |- style="background: yellow; text-align: center;" | ||
! colspan="9" | 38 Classes | ! colspan="9" | 38 Classes | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
|1 | |1 | ||
|McKay & Fujinaga | |McKay & Fujinaga | ||
− | |64.33% | + | |align="right " | 64.33% |
− | |1.04 | + | |align="right " | 1.04 |
− | |46.11% | + | |align="right " | 46.11% |
− | |1.51 | + | |align="right " | 1.51 |
− | |3 days | + | |align="right " | 3 days |
− | |R | + | |align="right " | R |
|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/MF_38eval.txt MF_38eval.txt] | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/MF_38eval.txt MF_38eval.txt] | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
|Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (NB) | |Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (NB) | ||
− | |62.60% | + | |align="right " | 62.60% |
− | |0.26 | + | |align="right " | 0.26 |
− | |45.05% | + | |align="right " | 45.05% |
− | |0.55 | + | |align="right " | 0.55 |
− | |N/A | + | |align="right " | N/A |
− | |N/A | + | |align="right " | N/A |
|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/BST_NB_38eval.txt BST_NB_38eval.txt] | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/BST_NB_38eval.txt BST_NB_38eval.txt] | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
|Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (J48) | |Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (J48) | ||
− | |57.61% | + | |align="right " | 57.61% |
− | |1.14 | + | |align="right " | 1.14 |
− | |40.95% | + | |align="right " | 40.95% |
− | |1.35 | + | |align="right " | 1.35 |
− | |N/A | + | |align="right " | N/A |
− | |N/A | + | |align="right " | N/A |
|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/BST_J48_38eval.txt BST_J48_38eval.txt] | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/BST_J48_38eval.txt BST_J48_38eval.txt] | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
|Li, M. | |Li, M. | ||
− | |54.91% | + | |align="right " | 54.91% |
− | |0.66 | + | |align="right " | 0.66 |
− | |39.79% | + | |align="right " | 39.79% |
− | |0.87 | + | |align="right " | 0.87 |
− | |15,948 | + | |align="right " | 15,948 |
− | |G | + | |align="right " | G |
|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/L_38eval.txt L_38eval.txt] | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/L_38eval.txt L_38eval.txt] | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|5 | |5 | ||
|Ponce de Leon & Inesta | |Ponce de Leon & Inesta | ||
− | |24.84% | + | |align="right " | 24.84% |
− | |1.40 | + | |align="right " | 1.40 |
− | |15.26% | + | |align="right " | 15.26% |
− | |1.13 | + | |align="right " | 1.13 |
− | |821 | + | |align="right " | 821 |
− | |L | + | |align="right " | L |
|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/PI_38eval.txt PI_38eval.txt] | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/results/2005/sym-genre/PI_38eval.txt PI_38eval.txt] | ||
|---- | |---- |
Revision as of 16:12, 2 August 2010
Introduction
Goal
To classify MIDI recordings into genre categories.
Dataset
Two sets of genre categories were used, one consisting of 38 categories and one consisting of 9 categories. Each category was represented by 25 MIDI files.Thus, the 38 genre test contained 950 MIDI files and the 9 genre test contained 225 MIDI files.Test runs were 3-fold cross validated with each algorithm tested using identical training and testing data splits.
Results
Overall
OVERALL | |||
---|---|---|---|
Rank | Participant | Mean Hierarchical Classification Accuracy | Mean Raw Classification Accuracy |
1 | McKay & Fujinaga | 77.17% | 65.28% |
2 | Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (NB) | 72.08% | 58.53% |
3 | Li, M. | 67.57% | 55.90% |
4 | Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (J48) | 67.14% | 53.14% |
5 | Ponce de Leon & Inesta | 37.76% | 26.52% |
38 Classes
38 Classes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Participant | Hierarchical Classification Accuracy | Hierarchical Classification Accuracy Std | Raw Classification Accuracy | Raw Classification Accuracy Std | Runtime (s) | Machine | Confusion Matrix Files |
1 | McKay & Fujinaga | 64.33% | 1.04 | 46.11% | 1.51 | 3 days | R | MF_38eval.txt |
2 | Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (NB) | 62.60% | 0.26 | 45.05% | 0.55 | N/A | N/A | BST_NB_38eval.txt |
3 | Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (J48) | 57.61% | 1.14 | 40.95% | 1.35 | N/A | N/A | BST_J48_38eval.txt |
4 | Li, M. | 54.91% | 0.66 | 39.79% | 0.87 | 15,948 | G | L_38eval.txt |
5 | Ponce de Leon & Inesta | 24.84% | 1.40 | 15.26% | 1.13 | 821 | L | PI_38eval.txt |
9 Classes
9 Classes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank | Participant | Hierarchical Classification Accuracy | Hierarchical Classification Accuracy Std | Raw Classification Accuracy | Raw Classification Accuracy Std | Runtime (s) | Machine | Confusion Matrix Files |
1 | McKay & Fujinaga | 90.00% | 0.60 | 84.44% | 1.41 | 18,375 | R | MF_9eval.txt |
2 | Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (NB) | 81.56% | 0.76 | 72.00% | 0.88 | N/A | N/A | BST_NB_9eval.txt |
3 | Li, M. | 80.22% | 1.47 | 72.00% | 2.31 | 3,777 | G | L_9eval.txt |
4 | Basili, Serafini, & Stellato (J48) | 76.67% | 1.11 | 65.33% | 1.65 | N/A | N/A | BST_J48_9eval.txt |
5 | Ponce de Leon & Inesta | 50.67% | 1.26 | 37.78% | 2.30 | 197 | L | PI_9eval.txt |