Difference between revisions of "2005:Audio Drum Detection Results"

From MIREX Wiki
Line 34: Line 34:
 
|-style="background: yellow;"
 
|-style="background: yellow;"
 
! Rank !! Participant !! Total Average Classification F-measure !! Total Overall Onset Precision !! Total Overall Onset Recall !! Total Overall Onset F-measure !! BD Average F-measure !! HH Average F-measure !! SD Average F-measure !! Runtime (s) !! Machine   
 
! Rank !! Participant !! Total Average Classification F-measure !! Total Overall Onset Precision !! Total Overall Onset Recall !! Total Overall Onset F-measure !! BD Average F-measure !! HH Average F-measure !! SD Average F-measure !! Runtime (s) !! Machine   
−
 
+
|-
−
 
+
|1 || Dittmar, C. || 0.753 || 77.73% || 72.56% || 0.751 || 0.783 || 0.696 || 0.790 
 +
|-
 +
|2 || Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno || 0.690 || 64.25% || 62.75% || 0.660 || 0.714 || 0.533 || 0.811 
 +
|-
 +
|3 || Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 3 || 0.595 || 61.85% || 64.85% || 0.633 || 0.685 || 0.568 || 0.548 
 +
|-
 +
|4 || Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 4 || 0.589 || 62.45% || 64.22% || 0.628 || 0.668 || 0.555 || 0.559 
 +
|-
 +
|5 || Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 1 || 0.580 || 57.78% || 65.94% || 0.616 || 0.669 || 0.553 || 0.533 
 +
|-
 +
|6 || Paulus, J. || 0.440 || 55.82% || 54.36% || 0.551 || 0.430 || 0.497 || 0.424 
 +
|-
 +
|7 || Gillet & Richard 2 || 0.401 || 77.22% || 30.16% || 0.434 || 0.658 || 0.156 || 0.364 
 +
|-
 +
|8 || Gillet & Richard 1 || 0.339 || 66.33% || 30.57% || 0.418 || 0.466 || 0.279 || 0.265 
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 44: Line 59:
 
|-style="background: yellow;"
 
|-style="background: yellow;"
 
! Rank !! Participant !! Total Average Classification F-measure !! Total Overall Onset Precision !! Total Overall Onset Recall !! Total Overall Onset F-measure !! BD Average F-measure !! HH Average F-measure !! SD Average F-measure !! Runtime (s) !! Machine   
 
! Rank !! Participant !! Total Average Classification F-measure !! Total Overall Onset Precision !! Total Overall Onset Recall !! Total Overall Onset F-measure !! BD Average F-measure !! HH Average F-measure !! SD Average F-measure !! Runtime (s) !! Machine   
−
 
+
|-
−
 
+
1  Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno  0.617  53.06%  66.30%  0.589  0.686  0.481  0.652 
 +
|-
 +
2  Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 3  0.546  52.67%  68.21%  0.594  0.613  0.485  0.525 
 +
|-
 +
3  Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 4  0.541  51.90%  67.98%  0.589  0.612  0.479  0.523 
 +
|-
 +
4  Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 1  0.533  47.48%  69.24%  0.577  0.602  0.467  0.511 
 +
|-
 +
5  Dittmar, C.  0.494  51.20%  51.51%  0.514  0.509  0.418  0.535 
 +
|-
 +
6  Paulus, J.  0.425  55.82%  55.10%  0.555  0.444  0.489  0.412 
 +
|-
 +
7  Gillet & Richard 2  0.273  66.68%  28.22%  0.397  0.393  0.178  0.269 
 +
|-
 +
8  Gillet & Richard 1  0.259  58.48%  26.11%  0.361  0.375  0.196  0.210
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 
<br>
 
<br>
Line 54: Line 84:
 
|-style="background: yellow;"
 
|-style="background: yellow;"
 
! Rank !! Participant !! Total Average Classification F-measure !! Total Overall Onset Precision !! Total Overall Onset Recall !! Total Overall Onset F-measure !! BD Average F-measure !! HH Average F-measure !! SD Average F-measure !! Runtime (s) !! Machine   
 
! Rank !! Participant !! Total Average Classification F-measure !! Total Overall Onset Precision !! Total Overall Onset Recall !! Total Overall Onset F-measure !! BD Average F-measure !! HH Average F-measure !! SD Average F-measure !! Runtime (s) !! Machine   
−
 
+
|-
−
 
+
1  Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno  0.716  76.13%  69.16%  0.725  0.776  0.661  0.710 
 +
|-
 +
2 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 4  0.685  72.32%  75.83%  0.740  0.766  0.691  0.599 
 +
|-
 +
3 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 3  0.683  72.74%  75.65%  0.742  0.763  0.701  0.585 
 +
|-
 +
4  Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 1  0.673  69.86%  77.12%  0.733  0.753  0.693  0.574 
 +
|-
 +
5 Gillet & Richard 2  0.630  81.60%  53.00%  0.643  0.774  0.517  0.599 
 +
|-
 +
6 Dittmar, C.  0.617  71.37%  67.78%  0.695  0.631  0.675  0.544 
 +
|-
 +
7 Paulus, J.  0.597  62.90%  75.47%  0.686  0.648  0.695  0.449 
 +
|-
 +
8  Gillet & Richard 1  0.544  76.11%  48.80%  0.595  0.715  0.479  0.436
 +
|-
 
|}
 
|}
 
<br>
 
<br>

Revision as of 22:04, 26 July 2010

Goal: To detect the occurences of drum events in polyphonic audio.

Dataset: At least 50 files of both live and sequenced music, with many genres encompassed and various degrees of drum audio contained in the files. Three collections of music were used: Christian Dittmar (CD), Koen Tanghe (KT) and Masataka Goto (MG). Participants were evaluated against music from each individual collection, and then the three collection scores are averaged to produce a composite score.

OVERALL
Rank Participant Total Average Classification F-measure Total Overall Onset Precision Total Overall Onset Recall Total Overall Onset F-measure BD Average F-measure HH Average F-measure SD Average F-measure Runtime (s) Machine
1 Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno 0.670 64.92% 67.02% 0.659 0.728 0.574 0.702 8534 B 0
2 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 3 0.611 63.30% 71.19% 0.670 0.688 0.601 0.555 1337 Y
3 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 4 0.609 62.57% 71.09% 0.666 0.686 0.590 0.562 1342 Y
4 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 1 0.599 60.02% 72.45% 0.657 0.677 0.588 0.542 1350 Y
5 Dittmar, C. 0.588 65.68% 63.38% 0.645 0.606 0.585 0.581 673 R
6 Paulus, J. 0.499 59.61% 64.86% 0.621 0.527 0.587 0.430 1137 L
7 Gillet & Richard 2 0.443 77.09% 40.63% 0.532 0.598 0.334 0.428 21248 F
8 Gillet & Richard 1 0.391 69.84% 37.98% 0.492 0.533 0.343 0.317 21997 F


CHRISTIAN DITTMAR COLLECTION
Rank Participant Total Average Classification F-measure Total Overall Onset Precision Total Overall Onset Recall Total Overall Onset F-measure BD Average F-measure HH Average F-measure SD Average F-measure Runtime (s) Machine
1 Dittmar, C. 0.753 77.73% 72.56% 0.751 0.783 0.696 0.790
2 Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno 0.690 64.25% 62.75% 0.660 0.714 0.533 0.811
3 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 3 0.595 61.85% 64.85% 0.633 0.685 0.568 0.548
4 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 4 0.589 62.45% 64.22% 0.628 0.668 0.555 0.559
5 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 1 0.580 57.78% 65.94% 0.616 0.669 0.553 0.533
6 Paulus, J. 0.440 55.82% 54.36% 0.551 0.430 0.497 0.424
7 Gillet & Richard 2 0.401 77.22% 30.16% 0.434 0.658 0.156 0.364
8 Gillet & Richard 1 0.339 66.33% 30.57% 0.418 0.466 0.279 0.265


1 Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno 0.617 53.06% 66.30% 0.589 0.686 0.481 0.652 2 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 3 0.546 52.67% 68.21% 0.594 0.613 0.485 0.525 3 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 4 0.541 51.90% 67.98% 0.589 0.612 0.479 0.523 4 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 1 0.533 47.48% 69.24% 0.577 0.602 0.467 0.511 5 Dittmar, C. 0.494 51.20% 51.51% 0.514 0.509 0.418 0.535 6 Paulus, J. 0.425 55.82% 55.10% 0.555 0.444 0.489 0.412 7 Gillet & Richard 2 0.273 66.68% 28.22% 0.397 0.393 0.178 0.269 8 Gillet & Richard 1 0.259 58.48% 26.11% 0.361 0.375 0.196 0.210
KOEN TANGHE COLLECTION
Rank Participant Total Average Classification F-measure Total Overall Onset Precision Total Overall Onset Recall Total Overall Onset F-measure BD Average F-measure HH Average F-measure SD Average F-measure Runtime (s) Machine


1 Yoshii, Goto, & Okuno 0.716 76.13% 69.16% 0.725 0.776 0.661 0.710 2 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 4 0.685 72.32% 75.83% 0.740 0.766 0.691 0.599 3 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 3 0.683 72.74% 75.65% 0.742 0.763 0.701 0.585 4 Tanghe, Degroeve, & De Baets 1 0.673 69.86% 77.12% 0.733 0.753 0.693 0.574 5 Gillet & Richard 2 0.630 81.60% 53.00% 0.643 0.774 0.517 0.599 6 Dittmar, C. 0.617 71.37% 67.78% 0.695 0.631 0.675 0.544 7 Paulus, J. 0.597 62.90% 75.47% 0.686 0.648 0.695 0.449 8 Gillet & Richard 1 0.544 76.11% 48.80% 0.595 0.715 0.479 0.436
MASATAKA GOTO COLLECTION (50 songs from RWC Music Database: RWC-MDB-P-2001)
Rank Participant Total Average Classification F-measure Total Overall Onset Precision Total Overall Onset Recall Total Overall Onset F-measure BD Average F-measure HH Average F-measure SD Average F-measure Runtime (s) Machine


Retrieved from "https://music-ir.org/mirex/w/index.php?title=2005:Audio_Drum_Detection_Results&oldid=7433"