Difference between revisions of "2005:Audio Artist Identification Results"
From MIREX Wiki
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 7 || Logan, B || 25.95% | | 7 || Logan, B || 25.95% | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | {| border="1" | ||
| + | |- style="background: yellow; text-align: center;" | ||
| + | ! colspan="7" | Magnatune Dataset | ||
| + | |-style="background: yellow;" | ||
| + | ! Rank !! Participant !! Raw Classification Accuracy !! Normalized Raw lassification Accuracy !! Runtime (s) !! Machine !! Confusion Matrix Files | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) || 77.26% || 79.64% || 24 hours || B0 || BCE_1_MTeval.txt | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 2 || Mandel & Ellis || 76.60% || 76.62% || 11073 || R || ME_MTeval.txt | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 3 || Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) || 74.45% || 74.51% || || || BCE_2_MTeval.txt | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 4 || Pampalk, E. || 66.36% || 66.48% || 4272 || B1 || P_MTeval.txt | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 5 | Tzanetakis, G. || 55.45% || 55.59% || 2632 || B0 || T_MTeval.txt | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 6 || West & Lamere || 53.43% || 53.48% || 27480 || B3 || WL_MTeval.txt | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 7 || Logan, B || 37.07% || 37.10% || N/A || B3 || L_MTeval.txt | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 8 || Lidy & Rauber (SSD+RH) || TO * || || || || || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 8 || Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD) || TO * || || || || || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 8 || Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD+RH) || TO * || || || || || | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 21:25, 26 July 2010
Goal: To identify artist from music audio (in PCM format).
Dataset: Two sets of data were used: Magnatune and USPOP. The audio sampling rates used were either 44.1 KHz or 22.05 KHz (mono). More data information is in the following table.
| Dataset | Size (@ 44.1 KHz) | Number of Training Files | Number of Testing Files |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnatune | 35.2 GB | 1158 | 642 |
| USPOP | 37.3 GB | 1158 | 653 |
| OVERALL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank | Participant | Mean of Magnatune Raw Classification Accuracy and USPOP Raw Classification Accuracy |
| 1 | Mandel & Ellis | 72.45% |
| 2 | Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) | 68.57% |
| 3 | Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) | 66.71% |
| 4 | Pampalk, E. | 61.28% |
| 5 | West & Lamere | 47.24% |
| 6 | Tzanetakis, G. | 42.05% |
| 7 | Logan, B | 25.95% |
| Magnatune Dataset | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Participant | Raw Classification Accuracy | Normalized Raw lassification Accuracy | Runtime (s) | Machine | Confusion Matrix Files | |
| 1 | Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (1) | 77.26% | 79.64% | 24 hours | B0 | BCE_1_MTeval.txt | |
| 2 | Mandel & Ellis | 76.60% | 76.62% | 11073 | R | ME_MTeval.txt | |
| 3 | Bergstra, Casagrande, & Eck (2) | 74.45% | 74.51% | BCE_2_MTeval.txt | |||
| 4 | Pampalk, E. | 66.36% | 66.48% | 4272 | B1 | P_MTeval.txt | |
| Tzanetakis, G. | 55.45% | 55.59% | 2632 | B0 | T_MTeval.txt | ||
| 6 | West & Lamere | 53.43% | 53.48% | 27480 | B3 | WL_MTeval.txt | |
| 7 | Logan, B | 37.07% | 37.10% | N/A | B3 | L_MTeval.txt | |
| 8 | Lidy & Rauber (SSD+RH) | TO * | |||||
| 8 | Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD) | TO * | |||||
| 8 | Lidy & Rauber (RP+SSD+RH) | TO * | |||||
