Difference between revisions of "2009:Structural Segmentation"
(→Potential Participants) |
(→Potential Participants) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Jouni Paulus, Tampere University of Technology, Finland | Jouni Paulus, Tampere University of Technology, Finland | ||
+ | |||
+ | Stephan Huebler, Technical University of Dresden, Germany | ||
==Issues and Discussion== | ==Issues and Discussion== |
Revision as of 02:30, 10 July 2009
The segment structure (or form) is one of the most important musical parameters. It is furthermore special because musical structure -- especially in popular music genres -- is accessible to everybody: it needs no particular musical knowledge.
Input: wave audio
Output: three column text file of the format <onset_time> <offset_time> <label>, i.e. like Chris Harte's chord labelling files (.lab). onset_time and offset_time in seconds, labels: 'A', 'B', ... where segments referring to the same structural element have the same label.
Ground truth data on audio is available for more than 200 songs, so given a quality measure everyone agrees on, evaluation wouldn't be harder than on other MIREX tasks. At the last ISMIR conference Lukashevich proposed a measure for segmentation evaluation.
Potential Participants
Matthias Mauch, Queen Mary, University of London --Matthias 08:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Maarten Grachten, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria -- Maarten
Geoffroy Peeters, IRCAM, Paris, France (depending on the kind of annotations)
Jouni Paulus, Tampere University of Technology, Finland
Stephan Huebler, Technical University of Dresden, Germany
Issues and Discussion
Thanks for the initiative! I might be interested in participating. Are you referring to segmentation of audio, or symbolic data? What set of annotated data did you refer to? [Maarten Grachten]
Yes, sorry, forgot to specify that. I'm mainly interested in audio, so I changed that above. --Matthias 11:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
The more the merrier: I could as well throw in the algo I implemented 2 years ago for my thesis [1]. I'm also curious about the annotated data mentioned. Thanks for your effort! --Ewald 17:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)