Difference between revisions of "2009:Structural Segmentation"
(→Issues and Discussion) |
(→Potential Participants) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Potential Participants== | ==Potential Participants== | ||
Matthias Mauch, Queen Mary, University of London --[[User:Matthiasmauch|Matthias]] 08:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | Matthias Mauch, Queen Mary, University of London --[[User:Matthiasmauch|Matthias]] 08:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Maarten Grachten, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria -- [[User:MaartenGrachten|Maarten]] | ||
==Issues and Discussion== | ==Issues and Discussion== | ||
Thanks for the initiative! I might be interested in participating. Are you referring to segmentation of audio, or symbolic data? What set of annotated data did you refer to? [Maarten Grachten] | Thanks for the initiative! I might be interested in participating. Are you referring to segmentation of audio, or symbolic data? What set of annotated data did you refer to? [Maarten Grachten] | ||
Revision as of 03:53, 30 June 2009
The segment structure (or form) is one of the most important musical parameters. It is furthermore special because musical structure -- especially in popular music genres -- is accessible to everybody: it needs no particular musical knowledge.
Ground truth data is available for more than 200 songs, so given a quality measure everyone agrees on, evaluation wouldn't be harder than on other MIREX tasks. At the last ISMIR conference Lukashevich proposed a measure for segmentation evaluation.
Potential Participants
Matthias Mauch, Queen Mary, University of London --Matthias 08:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Maarten Grachten, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria -- Maarten
Issues and Discussion
Thanks for the initiative! I might be interested in participating. Are you referring to segmentation of audio, or symbolic data? What set of annotated data did you refer to? [Maarten Grachten]
