Difference between revisions of "2025:Symbolic Music Generation Results"

From MIREX Wiki
(Results)
(Results)
Line 63: Line 63:
 
|}
 
|}
  
'''Note''': Results are reported in the form of mean ± sem<sup>s</sup> (sem refers to standard error of mean), where s is a letter. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences (p-value p < 0.05) based on a Wilcoxon signed rank test with Holm-Bonferroni correction.
+
 
 +
'''Notes on Evaluation Results''': Results are reported in the form of mean ± sem<sup>s</sup> (sem refers to standard error of mean), where s is a letter. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences (p-value p < 0.05) based on a Wilcoxon signed rank test with Holm-Bonferroni correction.
 +
 
 +
'''Notes on Baseline Models''': For MuseCoco, we use the *xlarge* model variant with 1.2 billion learnable parameters. For Anticipatory Music Transformer, we use the *Large* model variant with 780M learnable parameters.
  
 
'''Subjective Evaluation Details''': Each test sample was cherry-picked from 8 samples generated from the corresponding prompt. A total of 6 prompts of varied styles (Pop, Classical, and Jazz) were tested, resulting in a 6-page survey. Responses were collected from 20 participants with diverse music backgrounds.
 
'''Subjective Evaluation Details''': Each test sample was cherry-picked from 8 samples generated from the corresponding prompt. A total of 6 prompts of varied styles (Pop, Classical, and Jazz) were tested, resulting in a 6-page survey. Responses were collected from 20 participants with diverse music backgrounds.

Revision as of 00:21, 13 September 2025

Submissions

Team Extended Abstract Methods
RWKV (Zhou-Zheng et al.) [1] RWKV
PixelGen [2] Hierarchical Transformer
MuseCoco (BL-1) [3] Transformer
Anticipatory Music Transformer (BL-2) [4] Transformer

Results

Team Subjective Evaluation
Coherecy ↑ Structure ↑ Creativity ↑ Musicality ↑
RWKV (Zhou-Zheng et al.) 3.57 ± 0.10a 3.58 ± 0.10a 3.26 ± 0.10a 3.50 ± 0.10a
PixelGen 2.39 ± 0.10c 2.37 ± 0.09c 2.85 ± 0.09b 2.48 ± 0.09c
MuseCoco (BL-1) 3.11 ± 0.10b 3.07 ± 0.09b 3.08 ± 0.09ab 2.95 ± 0.09b
Anticipatory Music Transformer (BL-2) 3.70 ± 0.10a 3.69 ± 0.09a 3.30 ± 0.10a 3.45 ± 0.10a


Notes on Evaluation Results: Results are reported in the form of mean ± sems (sem refers to standard error of mean), where s is a letter. Different letters within a column indicate significant differences (p-value p < 0.05) based on a Wilcoxon signed rank test with Holm-Bonferroni correction.

Notes on Baseline Models: For MuseCoco, we use the *xlarge* model variant with 1.2 billion learnable parameters. For Anticipatory Music Transformer, we use the *Large* model variant with 780M learnable parameters.

Subjective Evaluation Details: Each test sample was cherry-picked from 8 samples generated from the corresponding prompt. A total of 6 prompts of varied styles (Pop, Classical, and Jazz) were tested, resulting in a 6-page survey. Responses were collected from 20 participants with diverse music backgrounds.