Difference between revisions of "Talk:Symbolic Genre Class"
From MIREX Wiki
(I like the idea of multiple-dimension classification) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
What do you think of the comments I made regarding simplification? | What do you think of the comments I made regarding simplification? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == I like the idea of multiple-dimension classification == | ||
| + | |||
| + | As users may have queries regarding different dimensions/facets/criteria, it is desirable to build classifiers on other dimensions than genre. I am particularly interested in predicting Hit/No-hit. It is cool to be a step ahead of fashion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I also like the idea of staring from simple things, but at the same time, we should keep our evaluations start-of-the-art. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:03, 20 February 2005
Hi everybody
What do you think of the comments I made regarding simplification?
I like the idea of multiple-dimension classification
As users may have queries regarding different dimensions/facets/criteria, it is desirable to build classifiers on other dimensions than genre. I am particularly interested in predicting Hit/No-hit. It is cool to be a step ahead of fashion.
I also like the idea of staring from simple things, but at the same time, we should keep our evaluations start-of-the-art.
