Difference between revisions of "2005:Audio Key Finding Results"
From MIREX Wiki
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|1 | |1 | ||
| − | |Izmirli, Ö. | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/izmirli.pdf Izmirli, Ö. ] |
|89.55% | |89.55% | ||
|1188.8 | |1188.8 | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
| − | |Purwins & Blankertz | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/purwins.pdf Purwins & Blankertz ] |
|89.00% | |89.00% | ||
|1122.4 | |1122.4 | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
| − | |Gómez, E. (start) | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/gomez.pdf Gómez, E. (start)] |
|86.05% | |86.05% | ||
|1081.9 | |1081.9 | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|4 | |4 | ||
| − | |Gómez, E. (global) | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/gomez.pdf Gómez, E. (global)] |
|85.90% | |85.90% | ||
|1076.1 | |1076.1 | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|5 | |5 | ||
| − | |Pauws, S. | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/pauws.pdf Pauws, S. ] |
|85.00% | |85.00% | ||
|1055.1 | |1055.1 | ||
| Line 141: | Line 141: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|6 | |6 | ||
| − | |Zhu, Y. | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/zhu.pdf Zhu, Y.] |
|83.25% | |83.25% | ||
|1066.2 | |1066.2 | ||
| Line 162: | Line 162: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|7 | |7 | ||
| − | |Chuan & Chew | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/chuan.pdf Chuan & Chew] |
|79.10% | |79.10% | ||
|1002.3 | |1002.3 | ||
Revision as of 16:11, 29 July 2010
| Rank | Participant | Composite Percentage Score | Total Score | Percentage Score | Correct Keys | Perfect 5th Errors | Relative Major/Minor Errors | Parallel Major/Minor Errors | Other Errors | Runtime (s) | Machine | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w | t | w | t | w | t | w | t | w | t | w | t | w | t | w | t | ||||
| 1 | Izmirli, Ö. | 89.55% | 1188.8 | 1122.9 | 89.4% | 89.7% | 1086 | 1089 | 36 | 42 | 38 | 31 | 17 | 18 | 75 | 72 | 15284 | 16354 | Y |
| 2 | Purwins & Blankertz | 89.00% | 1122.4 | 1106.5 | 89.6% | 88.4% | 1090 | 1060 | 44 | 72 | 24 | 21 | 16 | 21 | 78 | 78 | 45003 | 44232 | R |
| 3 | Gómez, E. (start) | 86.05% | 1081.9 | 1072.9 | 86.4% | 85.7% | 1048 | 1034 | 35 | 44 | 38 | 43 | 25 | 20 | 106 | 111 | 1560 | 1531 | B 0 |
| 4 | Gómez, E. (global) | 85.90% | 1076.1 | 1073.8 | 86.0% | 85.8% | 1019 | 1015 | 69 | 73 | 62 | 59 | 20 | 23 | 82 | 82 | 2041 | 1971 | B 0 |
| 5 | Pauws, S. | 85.00% | 1055.1 | 1072.8 | 84.3% | 85.7% | 1019 | 1034 | 20 | 23 | 67 | 69 | 30 | 33 | 116 | 93 | 503 | 507 | G |
| 6 | Zhu, Y. | 83.25% | 1066.2 | 1017.7 | 85.2% | 81.3% | 1034 | 964 | 38 | 66 | 28 | 47 | 24 | 33 | 128 | 142 | 25233 | 24039 | Y |
| 7 | Chuan & Chew | 79.10% | 1002.3 | 977.3 | 80.1% | 78.1% | 937 | 905 | 83 | 95 | 66 | 68 | 20 | 22 | 146 | 162 | 3299 | 3468 | R |
