Difference between revisions of "2008:MIREX2008 Plenary Topics"

From MIREX Wiki
(Comments)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Please post any questions or comments you might like the MIREX community to discuss during the meeting.
 
Please post any questions or comments you might like the MIREX community to discuss during the meeting.
 +
 +
==Comments==
 +
 +
It would be nice to have a discussion on potential new MIREX tasks: singing voice segments detection, music structure detection
 +
 +
Also a discussion about the possibility to have a new test set for audio chord detection
 +
 +
Qualitative tasks?
 +
 +
Possible changes in QBSH task to make it more real-world compliant (by Roger Jang):
 +
# More noise MIDIs to make the song database size > 10000 ===> Does IMIRSEL has enough computing power?
 +
# Corpous contribution from participants ===> Format? Tools? Guideline for corpus preparation?
 +
# Evaluation criteria that takes care of multiple versions of ground truths (to avoid human selection of noise MIDIs) ===> Top-10 recognition rate?
 +
# Release all corpora after each MIREX
 +
# Timing constraint for each submission ===> 10 seconds for each query?
 +
# Heterogeneous song database ===> MIDI, WAV

Latest revision as of 11:23, 17 September 2008

Greetings:

The MIREX 2008 plenary meeting will be held Wednesday, 17 September as a working lunch meeting at 13:30-15:00. This will be followed by the MIREX 2008 Poster Session which will be held 16:00-18:00.

Please post any questions or comments you might like the MIREX community to discuss during the meeting.

Comments

It would be nice to have a discussion on potential new MIREX tasks: singing voice segments detection, music structure detection

Also a discussion about the possibility to have a new test set for audio chord detection

Qualitative tasks?

Possible changes in QBSH task to make it more real-world compliant (by Roger Jang):

  1. More noise MIDIs to make the song database size > 10000 ===> Does IMIRSEL has enough computing power?
  2. Corpous contribution from participants ===> Format? Tools? Guideline for corpus preparation?
  3. Evaluation criteria that takes care of multiple versions of ground truths (to avoid human selection of noise MIDIs) ===> Top-10 recognition rate?
  4. Release all corpora after each MIREX
  5. Timing constraint for each submission ===> 10 seconds for each query?
  6. Heterogeneous song database ===> MIDI, WAV