Difference between revisions of "2025:RenCon Results"
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
The following table shows the final rankings based on weighted average scores from the preliminary round evaluation:  | The following table shows the final rankings based on weighted average scores from the preliminary round evaluation:  | ||
| − | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable"  | {| class="wikitable sortable"  | ||
! Rank  | ! Rank  | ||
| Line 40: | Line 39: | ||
! Authors/Institution  | ! Authors/Institution  | ||
! Weighted Score  | ! Weighted Score  | ||
| − | !   | + | ! PDF  | 
| − | |||
|-  | |-  | ||
| 1  | | 1  | ||
| − | |   | + | | MidnightOpal  | 
| − | |   | + | | DirectorMusices  | 
| − | |   | + | | Anders Friberg, Gabriel Jones  | 
| − | |   | + | | 4.33/5.0  | 
| − | | [  | + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/DirectorMusices.pdf PDF]  | 
| − | |||
|-  | |-  | ||
| 2  | | 2  | ||
| − | |   | + | | CrystalEcho  | 
| − | |   | + | | VirtuosoNet  | 
| − | |   | + | | Dasaem Jeong, Taegyun Kwon, Yoojin Kim, Kyogu Lee, Juhan Nam  | 
| − | |   | + | | 3.54/5.0  | 
| − | | [  | + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/VirtuosoNet.pdf PDF]  | 
| − | |||
|-  | |-  | ||
| 3  | | 3  | ||
| − | |   | + | | FrozenRiver  | 
| − | |   | + | | Midihum  | 
| − | |   | + | | Erich Grunewald  | 
| − | |   | + | | 3.32/5.0  | 
| − | | [  | + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/Midihum.pdf PDF]  | 
| − | |||
|-  | |-  | ||
| 4  | | 4  | ||
| − | |   | + | | VelvetStorm  | 
| − | |   | + | | ElegantAIPianist  | 
| − | |   | + | | Leduo Chen, Xinrui Su, Yuqiang Li, Honyu Andy Shing, Junchuan Zhao, Zihan Chai, Kunyang Zhang, Shengchen Li  | 
| − | |   | + | | 3.19/5.0  | 
| − | | [  | + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/ElegantAIPianist.pdf PDF]  | 
| − | |||
|-  | |-  | ||
| 5  | | 5  | ||
| − | |   | + | | SilverWave  | 
| − | |   | + | | Contin-U  | 
| − | |   | + | | Jongmin Jung, Dongmin Kim, Sihun Lee, Seola Cho, Hyungjoon Soh, Irmak Bukey, Chris Donahue, Dasaem Jeong  | 
| − | |   | + | | 3.00/5.0  | 
| − | | [  | + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/Contin-U.pdf PDF]  | 
| − | |||
|-  | |-  | ||
| 6  | | 6  | ||
| + | | EmberSky  | ||
| + | | YQX+  | ||
| + | | Jinwen Zhou, Yuncong Xie, Haochen Wang, Huan Zhang, Aidan Hogg, Simon Dixon  | ||
| + | | 2.83/5.0  | ||
| + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/YQX+.pdf PDF]  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | |   | ||
| + | | CrimsonDawn  | ||
| + | | ScorePerLockNAR  | ||
| + | | Weixi Zhai  | ||
| + | | 2.53/5.0  | ||
| + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/ScorePerLockNAR.pdf PDF]  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | |   | ||
| + | | AzureThunder  | ||
| + | | RenConnoisseur  | ||
| + | | Silvan Peter  | ||
| + | | 2.53/5.0  | ||
| + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/RenConnoisseur.pdf PDF]  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | |   | ||
| GoldenMist  | | GoldenMist  | ||
| − | |   | + | | CueFreeExpressPedal  | 
| − | |   | + | | Kyle Worrall, Tom Collins  | 
| − | |   | + | | 2.31/5.0  | 
| − | | [  | + | | [https://futuremirex.com/portal/wp-content/uploads/2025/rencon/CueFreeExpressPedal.pdf PDF]  | 
| − | |||
|}  | |}  | ||
| Line 108: | Line 121: | ||
* Handling of complex rhythmic patterns  | * Handling of complex rhythmic patterns  | ||
* Balance between technical accuracy and musical expression  | * Balance between technical accuracy and musical expression  | ||
| + | |||
== Live Contest Results ==  | == Live Contest Results ==  | ||
| − | + | The live contest was held on September 25, 2025, at the Daejeon Convention Center during ISMIR 2025. All systems rendered a surprise piece in real-time, with audience voting determining the final rankings. A total of '''50 evaluators''' participated in the live evaluation.  | |
=== Surprise Piece ===  | === Surprise Piece ===  | ||
| − | * '''Title:'''   | + | * '''Title:''' Variation on "Mother and Sister"  | 
| − | * '''Composer:'''   | + | * '''Composer:''' Hayeon Bang  | 
| − | * '''Duration:'''   | + | * '''Duration:''' ~3 minutes  | 
| − | * '''  | + | |
| + | |||
| + | === Live Contest Rankings ===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable sortable"  | ||
| + | ! Rank  | ||
| + | ! System Index  | ||
| + | ! Model Name  | ||
| + | ! Authors  | ||
| + | ! Live Score  | ||
| + | ! Preliminary Rank  | ||
| + | ! Score Change  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | 1st  | ||
| + | | #8  | ||
| + | | VirtuosoNet  | ||
| + | | Dasaem Jeong et al.  | ||
| + | | 3.62/5.0  | ||
| + | | 2nd  | ||
| + | | ↑1  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | 2nd  | ||
| + | | #1  | ||
| + | | DirectorMusices  | ||
| + | | Anders Friberg et al.  | ||
| + | | 3.06/5.0  | ||
| + | | 1st  | ||
| + | | ↓1  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | 3rd  | ||
| + | | #2  | ||
| + | | Midihum  | ||
| + | | Erich Grunewald  | ||
| + | | 2.90/5.0  | ||
| + | | 3rd  | ||
| + | | —  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | 4th  | ||
| + | | #4  | ||
| + | | Contin-U  | ||
| + | | Jongmin Jung et al.  | ||
| + | | 2.90/5.0  | ||
| + | | 5th  | ||
| + | | ↑1  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | 5th  | ||
| + | | #6  | ||
| + | | ScorePerLockNAR  | ||
| + | | Weixi Zhai  | ||
| + | | 2.52/5.0  | ||
| + | | 7th  | ||
| + | | ↑2  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | 6th  | ||
| + | | #3  | ||
| + | | RenConnoisseur  | ||
| + | | Silvan Peter  | ||
| + | | 2.40/5.0  | ||
| + | | 8th  | ||
| + | | ↑2  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | 7th  | ||
| + | | #9  | ||
| + | | ElegantAIPianist  | ||
| + | | Leduo Chen et al.  | ||
| + | | 2.08/5.0  | ||
| + | | 4th  | ||
| + | | ↓3  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | 8th  | ||
| + | | #5  | ||
| + | | YQX+  | ||
| + | | Jinwen Zhou et al.  | ||
| + | | 1.79/5.0  | ||
| + | | 6th  | ||
| + | | ↓2  | ||
| + | |}  | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Human Baseline Performance ===  | ||
| + | A human performance of the same surprise piece was also evaluated by the audience as a reference point:  | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| class="wikitable"  | ||
| + | ! Performance Type  | ||
| + | ! Score  | ||
| + | ! Rank Among All Performances  | ||
| + | |-  | ||
| + | | Human Performance  | ||
| + | | 4.40/5.0  | ||
| + | | 1st (Overall)  | ||
| + | |}  | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Performance Analysis ===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Top Performers:'''  | ||
| + | * '''VirtuosoNet''' achieved the highest AI system score (3.62/5.0), improving from 2nd place in the preliminary round  | ||
| + | * '''DirectorMusices''' maintained strong performance (3.06/5.0) but dropped from 1st to 2nd place  | ||
| + | * '''Midihum''' showed consistency, maintaining 3rd place across both rounds  | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Notable Changes:'''  | ||
| + | * '''ScorePerLockNAR''' and '''RenConnoisseur''' both improved by 2 positions in the live contest  | ||
| + | * '''ElegantAIPianist''' experienced the largest drop, falling from 4th to 7th place  | ||
| + | * '''Contin-U''' improved from 5th to 4th place in live evaluation  | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Human vs. AI Performance:'''  | ||
| + | * The human performance scored 4.40/5.0, significantly higher than the top AI system  | ||
| + | * This represents a performance gap of 0.78 points between human and best AI performance  | ||
| + | * All AI systems scored below the human baseline, indicating continued room for improvement  | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Final Winner ===  | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''🏆 RenCon 2025 Winner: VirtuosoNet'''  | ||
| + | * '''Team:''' Dasaem Jeong, Taegyun Kwon, Yoojin Kim, Kyogu Lee, Juhan Nam  | ||
| + | * '''Final Score:''' 3.62/5.0  | ||
| + | * '''Achievement:''' Highest-scoring AI system in live contest evaluation  | ||
| − | + | The winner was announced at the closing ceremony of ISMIR 2025 on September 25, 2025.  | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 09:22, 27 September 2025
Contents
2025:RenCon Results
Preliminary (Audition) Round Results
Evaluation Methodology
The preliminary round was evaluated through an online listening test with 25 expert evaluators. The evaluation used a weighted voting system where participants self-rated their expertise level from 1-5 stars, with responses weighted accordingly.
Participant Demographics
Our evaluation panel consisted of highly qualified judges:
Expertise Distribution:
- Expert evaluators (5 stars): 7 participants (29.2%)
 - High confidence (4 stars): 5 participants (20.8%)
 - Moderate confidence (3 stars): 10 participants (41.7%)
 - Lower confidence (1-2 stars): 2 participants (8.4%)
 - Average expertise weight: 3.67/5.0
 
Professional Background:
- Music researchers: 12 (54.5%)
 - Music technologists: 10 (45.5%)
 - Active performers: 8 (36.4%)
 - Conservatory students: 6 (27.3%)
 - Music lovers: 15 (68.2%)
 - Concert-goers: 8 (36.4%)
 
Musical Experience:
- Strong representation of classical music expertise
 - Diverse musical preferences spanning classical, jazz, pop, and rock
 - Substantial piano experience among evaluators
 - Mix of academic researchers and practicing musicians
 
System Rankings
The following table shows the final rankings based on weighted average scores from the preliminary round evaluation:
| Rank | Anonymous Name | Real System Name | Authors/Institution | Weighted Score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MidnightOpal | DirectorMusices | Anders Friberg, Gabriel Jones | 4.33/5.0 | |
| 2 | CrystalEcho | VirtuosoNet | Dasaem Jeong, Taegyun Kwon, Yoojin Kim, Kyogu Lee, Juhan Nam | 3.54/5.0 | |
| 3 | FrozenRiver | Midihum | Erich Grunewald | 3.32/5.0 | |
| 4 | VelvetStorm | ElegantAIPianist | Leduo Chen, Xinrui Su, Yuqiang Li, Honyu Andy Shing, Junchuan Zhao, Zihan Chai, Kunyang Zhang, Shengchen Li | 3.19/5.0 | |
| 5 | SilverWave | Contin-U | Jongmin Jung, Dongmin Kim, Sihun Lee, Seola Cho, Hyungjoon Soh, Irmak Bukey, Chris Donahue, Dasaem Jeong | 3.00/5.0 | |
| 6 | EmberSky | YQX+ | Jinwen Zhou, Yuncong Xie, Haochen Wang, Huan Zhang, Aidan Hogg, Simon Dixon | 2.83/5.0 | |
| CrimsonDawn | ScorePerLockNAR | Weixi Zhai | 2.53/5.0 | ||
| AzureThunder | RenConnoisseur | Silvan Peter | 2.53/5.0 | ||
| GoldenMist | CueFreeExpressPedal | Kyle Worrall, Tom Collins | 2.31/5.0 | 
Note: Complete rankings and system details will be updated following the live contest and final results announcement.
Qualitative Feedback
Evaluators provided extensive qualitative feedback on the systems' performances:
Common Positive Attributes:
- Natural expressiveness and human-like phrasing
 - Appropriate tempo variations and rubato
 - Musical sensitivity to harmonic structure
 - Dynamic expression and articulation
 
Areas for Improvement:
- Consistency across different musical styles
 - Handling of complex rhythmic patterns
 - Balance between technical accuracy and musical expression
 
Live Contest Results
The live contest was held on September 25, 2025, at the Daejeon Convention Center during ISMIR 2025. All systems rendered a surprise piece in real-time, with audience voting determining the final rankings. A total of 50 evaluators participated in the live evaluation.
Surprise Piece
- Title: Variation on "Mother and Sister"
 - Composer: Hayeon Bang
 - Duration: ~3 minutes
 
Live Contest Rankings
| Rank | System Index | Model Name | Authors | Live Score | Preliminary Rank | Score Change | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | #8 | VirtuosoNet | Dasaem Jeong et al. | 3.62/5.0 | 2nd | ↑1 | 
| 2nd | #1 | DirectorMusices | Anders Friberg et al. | 3.06/5.0 | 1st | ↓1 | 
| 3rd | #2 | Midihum | Erich Grunewald | 2.90/5.0 | 3rd | — | 
| 4th | #4 | Contin-U | Jongmin Jung et al. | 2.90/5.0 | 5th | ↑1 | 
| 5th | #6 | ScorePerLockNAR | Weixi Zhai | 2.52/5.0 | 7th | ↑2 | 
| 6th | #3 | RenConnoisseur | Silvan Peter | 2.40/5.0 | 8th | ↑2 | 
| 7th | #9 | ElegantAIPianist | Leduo Chen et al. | 2.08/5.0 | 4th | ↓3 | 
| 8th | #5 | YQX+ | Jinwen Zhou et al. | 1.79/5.0 | 6th | ↓2 | 
Human Baseline Performance
A human performance of the same surprise piece was also evaluated by the audience as a reference point:
| Performance Type | Score | Rank Among All Performances | 
|---|---|---|
| Human Performance | 4.40/5.0 | 1st (Overall) | 
Performance Analysis
Top Performers:
- VirtuosoNet achieved the highest AI system score (3.62/5.0), improving from 2nd place in the preliminary round
 - DirectorMusices maintained strong performance (3.06/5.0) but dropped from 1st to 2nd place
 - Midihum showed consistency, maintaining 3rd place across both rounds
 
Notable Changes:
- ScorePerLockNAR and RenConnoisseur both improved by 2 positions in the live contest
 - ElegantAIPianist experienced the largest drop, falling from 4th to 7th place
 - Contin-U improved from 5th to 4th place in live evaluation
 
Human vs. AI Performance:
- The human performance scored 4.40/5.0, significantly higher than the top AI system
 - This represents a performance gap of 0.78 points between human and best AI performance
 - All AI systems scored below the human baseline, indicating continued room for improvement
 
Final Winner
🏆 RenCon 2025 Winner: VirtuosoNet
- Team: Dasaem Jeong, Taegyun Kwon, Yoojin Kim, Kyogu Lee, Juhan Nam
 - Final Score: 3.62/5.0
 - Achievement: Highest-scoring AI system in live contest evaluation
 
The winner was announced at the closing ceremony of ISMIR 2025 on September 25, 2025.