Difference between revisions of "2014:Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation & Tracking Results"
(Created page with "==Introduction== These are the results for the 2008 running of the Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation and Tracking task. For background information about this task set ple...") |
|||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Below are the average scores across 40 test files. These files come from 3 different sources: woodwind quintet recording of bassoon, clarinet, horn,flute and oboe (UIUC); Rendered MIDI using RWC database donated by IRCAM and a quartet recording of bassoon, clarinet, violin and sax donated by Dr. Bryan Pardo`s Interactive Audio Lab (IAL). 20 files coming from 5 sections of the woodwind recording where each section has 4 files ranging from 2 polyphony to 5 polyphony. 12 files from IAL, coming from 4 different songs ranging from 2 polyphony to 4 polyphony and 8 files from RWC synthesized midi ranging from 2 different songs ranging from 2 polphony to 5 polyphony. | Below are the average scores across 40 test files. These files come from 3 different sources: woodwind quintet recording of bassoon, clarinet, horn,flute and oboe (UIUC); Rendered MIDI using RWC database donated by IRCAM and a quartet recording of bassoon, clarinet, violin and sax donated by Dr. Bryan Pardo`s Interactive Audio Lab (IAL). 20 files coming from 5 sections of the woodwind recording where each section has 4 files ranging from 2 polyphony to 5 polyphony. 12 files from IAL, coming from 4 different songs ranging from 2 polyphony to 4 polyphony and 8 files from RWC synthesized midi ranging from 2 different songs ranging from 2 polphony to 5 polyphony. | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/est/summary/task1.overall.csv</csv> |
====Detailed Results==== | ====Detailed Results==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/est/summary/task1.results.csv</csv> |
====Detailed Chroma Results==== | ====Detailed Chroma Results==== | ||
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating) | Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating) | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/est/summary/task1.chroma.results.csv</csv> |
===Individual Results Files for Task 1=== | ===Individual Results Files for Task 1=== | ||
− | '''BW1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/ | + | '''BW1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/est/BW1.results.tar Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde]<br /> |
− | ''' | + | '''EF1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/est/EF1.results.tar Anders Elowsson, Anders Friberg]<br /> |
− | ''' | + | '''KD2'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/est/KD2.results.tar Karin Dressler]<br /> |
− | + | '''RM1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/est/RM1.results.tar Daniel Recoskie, Richard Mann]<br /> | |
+ | '''SY1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/est/SY1.results.tar Li Su, Yi-Hsuan Yang]<br /> | ||
+ | '''SY2'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/est/SY2.results.tar Li Su, Yi-Hsuan Yang]<br /> | ||
+ | '''SY3'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/est/SY3.results.tar Li Su, Yi-Hsuan Yang]<br /> | ||
=====Info about the filenames===== | =====Info about the filenames===== | ||
Line 68: | Line 71: | ||
===Run Times=== | ===Run Times=== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/est/runtimes_mf0_2014.csv</csv> |
===Friedman tests for Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation (MF0E)=== | ===Friedman tests for Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation (MF0E)=== | ||
Line 75: | Line 78: | ||
====Tukey-Kramer HSD Multi-Comparison==== | ====Tukey-Kramer HSD Multi-Comparison==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/est/summary/Accuracy_Per_Song_Friedman_Mean_Rankstask1.friedman.Friedman_TukeyKramerHSD.csv</csv> |
− | [[File: | + | [[File:2014_Accuracy_Per_Song_Friedman_Mean_Rankstask1.friedman.Friedman_Mean_Ranks.png|500px]] |
==Task 2:Note Tracking (NT)== | ==Task 2:Note Tracking (NT)== | ||
Line 85: | Line 88: | ||
A total of 34 files were used in this subtask: 16 from woodwind recording, 8 from IAL quintet recording and 6 piano. | A total of 34 files were used in this subtask: 16 from woodwind recording, 8 from IAL quintet recording and 6 piano. | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary/task2.overall.results.csv</csv> |
====Detailed Results==== | ====Detailed Results==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary/task2.results.csv</csv> |
====Detailed Chroma Results==== | ====Detailed Chroma Results==== | ||
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating) | Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating) | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary/task2.chroma.results.csv</csv> |
====Results Based on Onset Only==== | ====Results Based on Onset Only==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary/task2.onsetOnly.results.csv</csv> |
====Chroma Results Based on Onset Only==== | ====Chroma Results Based on Onset Only==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary/task2.onsetOnly.chroma.results.csv</csv> |
====Run Times==== | ====Run Times==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/runtimes_NT_2014.csv</csv> |
====Friedman Tests for Note Tracking==== | ====Friedman Tests for Note Tracking==== | ||
Line 114: | Line 117: | ||
=====Tukey-Kramer HSD Multi-Comparison for Task2===== | =====Tukey-Kramer HSD Multi-Comparison for Task2===== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary/Accuracy_Per_Song_Friedman_Mean_Rankstask2.onsetOnly.friedman.Friedman_TukeyKramerHSD.csv</csv> |
− | [[File: | + | [[File:2014_Accuracy_Per_Song_Friedman_Mean_Rankstask2.onsetOnly.friedman.Friedman_Mean_Ranks.png|500px]] |
===NT Piano-Only Overall Summary Results=== | ===NT Piano-Only Overall Summary Results=== | ||
Line 122: | Line 125: | ||
6 piano recordings are evaluated separately for this subtask. | 6 piano recordings are evaluated separately for this subtask. | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary_piano_subtask/task2_piano.overall.results.csv</csv> |
====Detailed Results==== | ====Detailed Results==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary_piano_subtask/task2_piano.results.csv</csv> |
====Detailed Chroma Results==== | ====Detailed Chroma Results==== | ||
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating) | Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating) | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary_piano_subtask/task2_piano.chroma.results.csv</csv> |
====Results Based on Onset Only==== | ====Results Based on Onset Only==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary_piano_subtask/task2_piano.onsetOnly.results.csv</csv> |
====Chroma Results Based on Onset Only==== | ====Chroma Results Based on Onset Only==== | ||
− | <csv> | + | <csv>2014/mf0/nt/summary_piano_subtask/task2_piano.onsetOnly.chroma.results.csv</csv> |
===Individual Results Files for Task 2=== | ===Individual Results Files for Task 2=== | ||
− | '''BW2'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/ | + | '''BW2'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/BW2.results.tar.gz Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde]<br /> |
− | '''BW3'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/ | + | '''BW3'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/BW3.results.tar.gz Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde]<br /> |
− | ''' | + | '''CB1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/CB1.results.tar Chris Cannam, Emmanouil Benetos]<br /> |
+ | '''CD3'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/CD3.results.tar Andrea Cogliati, Zhiyao Duan]<br /> | ||
+ | '''DT1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/DT1.results.tar Zhiyao Duan, David Temperley]<br /> | ||
+ | '''DT2'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/DT2.results.tar Zhiyao Duan, David Temperley]<br /> | ||
+ | '''DT3'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/DT3.results.tar Zhiyao Duan, David Temperley]<br /> | ||
+ | '''EF1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/EF1.results.tar Anders Elowsson, Anders Friberg]<br /> | ||
+ | '''KD2'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/KD2.results.tar Karin Dressler]<br /> | ||
+ | '''RM1'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/RM1.results.tar Daniel Recoskie, Richard Mann]<br /> | ||
+ | '''SB5'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/SB5.results.tar Sebastian Böck]<br /> | ||
+ | '''SY4'''= [https://music-ir.org/mirex/results/2014/mf0/nt/SY4.results.tar Li Su, Yi-Hsuan Yang]<br /> |
Revision as of 20:15, 15 October 2014
Contents
Introduction
These are the results for the 2008 running of the Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation and Tracking task. For background information about this task set please refer to the 2013:Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation & Tracking page.
General Legend
Sub code | Submission name | Abstract | Contributors |
---|---|---|---|
CDM1 | CDM1 | Tian Cheng, Simon Dixon, Matthias Mauch | |
CDM2 | CDM2 | Tian Cheng, Simon Dixon, Matthias Mauch | |
CDM3 | CDM3 | Tian Cheng, Simon Dixon, Matthias Mauch | |
BW1 | MSSIPLCA_fast_MultiF0 | Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde | |
BW2 | MSSIPLCA_fast_NoteTracking1 | Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde | |
BW3 | MSSIPLCA_fast_NoteTracking2 | Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde |
Task 1: Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation (MF0E)
MF0E Overall Summary Results
Below are the average scores across 40 test files. These files come from 3 different sources: woodwind quintet recording of bassoon, clarinet, horn,flute and oboe (UIUC); Rendered MIDI using RWC database donated by IRCAM and a quartet recording of bassoon, clarinet, violin and sax donated by Dr. Bryan Pardo`s Interactive Audio Lab (IAL). 20 files coming from 5 sections of the woodwind recording where each section has 4 files ranging from 2 polyphony to 5 polyphony. 12 files from IAL, coming from 4 different songs ranging from 2 polyphony to 4 polyphony and 8 files from RWC synthesized midi ranging from 2 different songs ranging from 2 polphony to 5 polyphony.
BW1 | EF1 | KD2 | RM1 | SY1 | SY2 | SY3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy | 0.657 | 0.723 | 0.68 | 0.411 | 0.634 | 0.635 | 0.609 |
Accuracy Chroma | 0.69 | 0.739 | 0.702 | 0.484 | 0.663 | 0.665 | 0.638 |
Detailed Results
Precision | Recall | Accuracy | Etot | Esubs | Emiss | Efa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BW1 | 0.751 | 0.747 | 0.657 | 0.412 | 0.112 | 0.140 | 0.159 | |
EF1 | 0.857 | 0.775 | 0.723 | 0.316 | 0.063 | 0.163 | 0.090 | |
KD2 | 0.774 | 0.773 | 0.680 | 0.374 | 0.094 | 0.133 | 0.147 | |
RM1 | 0.498 | 0.483 | 0.411 | 0.717 | 0.317 | 0.200 | 0.200 | |
SY1 | 0.701 | 0.767 | 0.634 | 0.474 | 0.126 | 0.108 | 0.241 | |
SY2 | 0.738 | 0.732 | 0.635 | 0.466 | 0.118 | 0.150 | 0.198 | |
SY3 | 0.690 | 0.743 | 0.609 | 0.545 | 0.128 | 0.129 | 0.288 |
Detailed Chroma Results
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating)
Precision | Recall | Accuracy | Etot | Esubs | Emiss | Efa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BW1 | 0.789 | 0.789 | 0.690 | 0.370 | 0.071 | 0.140 | 0.159 | |
EF1 | 0.876 | 0.793 | 0.739 | 0.297 | 0.045 | 0.163 | 0.090 | |
KD2 | 0.801 | 0.798 | 0.702 | 0.349 | 0.069 | 0.133 | 0.147 | |
RM1 | 0.588 | 0.568 | 0.484 | 0.631 | 0.232 | 0.200 | 0.200 | |
SY1 | 0.736 | 0.802 | 0.663 | 0.439 | 0.091 | 0.108 | 0.241 | |
SY2 | 0.777 | 0.769 | 0.665 | 0.429 | 0.081 | 0.150 | 0.198 | |
SY3 | 0.726 | 0.780 | 0.638 | 0.508 | 0.090 | 0.129 | 0.288 |
Individual Results Files for Task 1
BW1= Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde
EF1= Anders Elowsson, Anders Friberg
KD2= Karin Dressler
RM1= Daniel Recoskie, Richard Mann
SY1= Li Su, Yi-Hsuan Yang
SY2= Li Su, Yi-Hsuan Yang
SY3= Li Su, Yi-Hsuan Yang
Info about the filenames
The filenames starting with part* comes from acoustic woodwind recording, the ones starting with RWC are synthesized. The legend about the instruments are:
bs = bassoon, cl = clarinet, fl = flute, hn = horn, ob = oboe, vl = violin, cel = cello, gtr = guitar, sax = saxophone, bass = electric bass guitar
Run Times
sub_ID | Runtime(sec) |
---|---|
BW1 | 2677 |
EF1 | 10800 |
KD2 | 180 |
RM1 | 7401 |
SY1 | ~600 |
SY2 | ~600 |
SY3 | ~600 |
Friedman tests for Multiple Fundamental Frequency Estimation (MF0E)
The Friedman test was run in MATLAB to test significant differences amongst systems with regard to the performance (accuracy) on individual files.
Tukey-Kramer HSD Multi-Comparison
TeamID | TeamID | Lowerbound | Mean | Upperbound | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EF1 | KD2 | 0.4258 | 1.8500 | 3.2742 | TRUE |
EF1 | BW1 | 0.5758 | 2.0000 | 3.4242 | TRUE |
EF1 | SY2 | 0.7008 | 2.1250 | 3.5492 | TRUE |
EF1 | SY1 | 1.1008 | 2.5250 | 3.9492 | TRUE |
EF1 | SY3 | 2.1758 | 3.6000 | 5.0242 | TRUE |
EF1 | RM1 | 3.8008 | 5.2250 | 6.6492 | TRUE |
KD2 | BW1 | -1.2742 | 0.1500 | 1.5742 | FALSE |
KD2 | SY2 | -1.1492 | 0.2750 | 1.6992 | FALSE |
KD2 | SY1 | -0.7492 | 0.6750 | 2.0992 | FALSE |
KD2 | SY3 | 0.3258 | 1.7500 | 3.1742 | TRUE |
KD2 | RM1 | 1.9508 | 3.3750 | 4.7992 | TRUE |
BW1 | SY2 | -1.2992 | 0.1250 | 1.5492 | FALSE |
BW1 | SY1 | -0.8992 | 0.5250 | 1.9492 | FALSE |
BW1 | SY3 | 0.1758 | 1.6000 | 3.0242 | TRUE |
BW1 | RM1 | 1.8008 | 3.2250 | 4.6492 | TRUE |
SY2 | SY1 | -1.0242 | 0.4000 | 1.8242 | FALSE |
SY2 | SY3 | 0.0508 | 1.4750 | 2.8992 | TRUE |
SY2 | RM1 | 1.6758 | 3.1000 | 4.5242 | TRUE |
SY1 | SY3 | -0.3492 | 1.0750 | 2.4992 | FALSE |
SY1 | RM1 | 1.2758 | 2.7000 | 4.1242 | TRUE |
SY3 | RM1 | 0.2008 | 1.6250 | 3.0492 | TRUE |
Task 2:Note Tracking (NT)
NT Mixed Set Overall Summary Results
This subtask is evaluated in two different ways. In the first setup , a returned note is assumed correct if its onset is within +-50ms of a ref note and its F0 is within +- quarter tone of the corresponding reference note, ignoring the returned offset values. In the second setup, on top of the above requirements, a correct returned note is required to have an offset value within 20% of the ref notes duration around the ref note`s offset, or within 50ms whichever is larger.
A total of 34 files were used in this subtask: 16 from woodwind recording, 8 from IAL quintet recording and 6 piano.
BW2 | BW3 | CB1 | DT1 | DT2 | DT3 | EF1 | KD2 | RM1 | SB5 | SY4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ave. F-Measure Onset-Offset | 0.3625 | 0.3254 | 0.2558 | 0.2376 | 0.2787 | 0.2820 | 0.5817 | 0.4380 | 0.2655 | 0.1439 | 0.2908 |
Ave. F-Measure Onset Only | 0.5845 | 0.5354 | 0.4828 | 0.3889 | 0.4475 | 0.4506 | 0.8213 | 0.6592 | 0.4367 | 0.5471 | 0.4602 |
Ave. F-Measure Chroma | 0.3825 | 0.3712 | 0.2683 | 0.2540 | 0.2957 | 0.2994 | 0.5821 | 0.4482 | 0.2830 | 0.1681 | 0.3133 |
Ave. F-Measure Onset Only Chroma | 0.6132 | 0.5965 | 0.5169 | 0.4224 | 0.4823 | 0.4855 | 0.8107 | 0.6650 | 0.4749 | 0.6101 | 0.5007 |
Detailed Results
Precision | Recall | Ave. F-measure | Ave. Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW2 | 0.355 | 0.387 | 0.363 | 0.878 |
BW3 | 0.285 | 0.399 | 0.325 | 0.882 |
CB1 | 0.241 | 0.285 | 0.256 | 0.864 |
DT1 | 0.192 | 0.334 | 0.238 | 0.847 |
DT2 | 0.259 | 0.315 | 0.279 | 0.848 |
DT3 | 0.265 | 0.315 | 0.282 | 0.848 |
EF1 | 0.596 | 0.573 | 0.582 | 0.882 |
KD2 | 0.420 | 0.463 | 0.438 | 0.889 |
RM1 | 0.256 | 0.286 | 0.265 | 0.857 |
SB5 | 0.145 | 0.152 | 0.144 | 0.837 |
SY4 | 0.299 | 0.290 | 0.291 | 0.881 |
Detailed Chroma Results
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating)
Precision | Recall | Ave. F-measure | Ave. Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW2 | 0.376 | 0.408 | 0.382 | 0.875 |
BW3 | 0.322 | 0.461 | 0.371 | 0.881 |
CB1 | 0.253 | 0.299 | 0.268 | 0.862 |
DT1 | 0.204 | 0.358 | 0.254 | 0.843 |
DT2 | 0.275 | 0.335 | 0.296 | 0.847 |
DT3 | 0.281 | 0.335 | 0.299 | 0.846 |
EF1 | 0.597 | 0.573 | 0.582 | 0.881 |
KD2 | 0.430 | 0.473 | 0.448 | 0.887 |
RM1 | 0.272 | 0.305 | 0.283 | 0.856 |
SB5 | 0.168 | 0.179 | 0.168 | 0.860 |
SY4 | 0.323 | 0.313 | 0.313 | 0.880 |
Results Based on Onset Only
Precision | Recall | Ave. F-measure | Ave. Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW2 | 0.597 | 0.599 | 0.584 | 0.741 |
BW3 | 0.473 | 0.645 | 0.535 | 0.735 |
CB1 | 0.465 | 0.523 | 0.483 | 0.683 |
DT1 | 0.317 | 0.540 | 0.389 | 0.686 |
DT2 | 0.421 | 0.501 | 0.447 | 0.695 |
DT3 | 0.428 | 0.500 | 0.451 | 0.695 |
EF1 | 0.843 | 0.807 | 0.821 | 0.774 |
KD2 | 0.638 | 0.690 | 0.659 | 0.788 |
RM1 | 0.425 | 0.469 | 0.437 | 0.703 |
SB5 | 0.529 | 0.598 | 0.547 | 0.579 |
SY4 | 0.488 | 0.448 | 0.460 | 0.692 |
Chroma Results Based on Onset Only
Precision | Recall | Ave. F-measure | Ave. Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW2 | 0.626 | 0.630 | 0.613 | 0.727 |
BW3 | 0.524 | 0.726 | 0.596 | 0.715 |
CB1 | 0.497 | 0.562 | 0.517 | 0.659 |
DT1 | 0.344 | 0.588 | 0.422 | 0.630 |
DT2 | 0.454 | 0.541 | 0.482 | 0.665 |
DT3 | 0.461 | 0.540 | 0.486 | 0.664 |
EF1 | 0.832 | 0.796 | 0.811 | 0.767 |
KD2 | 0.644 | 0.696 | 0.665 | 0.777 |
RM1 | 0.462 | 0.511 | 0.475 | 0.684 |
SB5 | 0.587 | 0.670 | 0.610 | 0.582 |
SY4 | 0.529 | 0.489 | 0.501 | 0.637 |
Run Times
sub_ID | Runtime(sec) |
---|---|
BW2 | 3078 |
BW3 | 1593 |
CB1 | 7493 |
CD3 (piano only) | 28929 |
DT1 | ~72000 |
DT2 | 79458 |
DT3 | 77877 |
EF1 | 23400 |
KD2 | 180 |
RM1 | 3309 |
SB5 | 180 |
SY4 | ~600 |
Friedman Tests for Note Tracking
The Friedman test was run in MATLAB to test significant differences amongst systems with regard to the F-measure on individual files.
Tukey-Kramer HSD Multi-Comparison for Task2
TeamID | TeamID | Lowerbound | Mean | Upperbound | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EF1 | KD2 | -0.8534 | 1.7353 | 4.3240 | FALSE |
EF1 | BW2 | 0.5583 | 3.1471 | 5.7358 | TRUE |
EF1 | SB5 | 1.8083 | 4.3971 | 6.9858 | TRUE |
EF1 | BW3 | 2.1613 | 4.7500 | 7.3387 | TRUE |
EF1 | CB1 | 3.5583 | 6.1471 | 8.7358 | TRUE |
EF1 | SY4 | 3.4995 | 6.0882 | 8.6770 | TRUE |
EF1 | DT3 | 3.3377 | 5.9265 | 8.5152 | TRUE |
EF1 | DT2 | 3.5730 | 6.1618 | 8.7505 | TRUE |
EF1 | RM1 | 3.4995 | 6.0882 | 8.6770 | TRUE |
EF1 | DT1 | 5.7054 | 8.2941 | 10.8829 | TRUE |
KD2 | BW2 | -1.1770 | 1.4118 | 4.0005 | FALSE |
KD2 | SB5 | 0.0730 | 2.6618 | 5.2505 | TRUE |
KD2 | BW3 | 0.4260 | 3.0147 | 5.6034 | TRUE |
KD2 | CB1 | 1.8230 | 4.4118 | 7.0005 | TRUE |
KD2 | SY4 | 1.7642 | 4.3529 | 6.9417 | TRUE |
KD2 | DT3 | 1.6024 | 4.1912 | 6.7799 | TRUE |
KD2 | DT2 | 1.8377 | 4.4265 | 7.0152 | TRUE |
KD2 | RM1 | 1.7642 | 4.3529 | 6.9417 | TRUE |
KD2 | DT1 | 3.9701 | 6.5588 | 9.1476 | TRUE |
BW2 | SB5 | -1.3387 | 1.2500 | 3.8387 | FALSE |
BW2 | BW3 | -0.9858 | 1.6029 | 4.1917 | FALSE |
BW2 | CB1 | 0.4113 | 3.0000 | 5.5887 | TRUE |
BW2 | SY4 | 0.3524 | 2.9412 | 5.5299 | TRUE |
BW2 | DT3 | 0.1907 | 2.7794 | 5.3681 | TRUE |
BW2 | DT2 | 0.4260 | 3.0147 | 5.6034 | TRUE |
BW2 | RM1 | 0.3524 | 2.9412 | 5.5299 | TRUE |
BW2 | DT1 | 2.5583 | 5.1471 | 7.7358 | TRUE |
SB5 | BW3 | -2.2358 | 0.3529 | 2.9417 | FALSE |
SB5 | CB1 | -0.8387 | 1.7500 | 4.3387 | FALSE |
SB5 | SY4 | -0.8976 | 1.6912 | 4.2799 | FALSE |
SB5 | DT3 | -1.0593 | 1.5294 | 4.1181 | FALSE |
SB5 | DT2 | -0.8240 | 1.7647 | 4.3534 | FALSE |
SB5 | RM1 | -0.8976 | 1.6912 | 4.2799 | FALSE |
SB5 | DT1 | 1.3083 | 3.8971 | 6.4858 | TRUE |
BW3 | CB1 | -1.1917 | 1.3971 | 3.9858 | FALSE |
BW3 | SY4 | -1.2505 | 1.3382 | 3.9270 | FALSE |
BW3 | DT3 | -1.4123 | 1.1765 | 3.7652 | FALSE |
BW3 | DT2 | -1.1770 | 1.4118 | 4.0005 | FALSE |
BW3 | RM1 | -1.2505 | 1.3382 | 3.9270 | FALSE |
BW3 | DT1 | 0.9554 | 3.5441 | 6.1329 | TRUE |
CB1 | SY4 | -2.6476 | -0.0588 | 2.5299 | FALSE |
CB1 | DT3 | -2.8093 | -0.2206 | 2.3681 | FALSE |
CB1 | DT2 | -2.5740 | 0.0147 | 2.6034 | FALSE |
CB1 | RM1 | -2.6476 | -0.0588 | 2.5299 | FALSE |
CB1 | DT1 | -0.4417 | 2.1471 | 4.7358 | FALSE |
SY4 | DT3 | -2.7505 | -0.1618 | 2.4270 | FALSE |
SY4 | DT2 | -2.5152 | 0.0735 | 2.6623 | FALSE |
SY4 | RM1 | -2.5887 | 0.0000 | 2.5887 | FALSE |
SY4 | DT1 | -0.3829 | 2.2059 | 4.7946 | FALSE |
DT3 | DT2 | -2.3534 | 0.2353 | 2.8240 | FALSE |
DT3 | RM1 | -2.4270 | 0.1618 | 2.7505 | FALSE |
DT3 | DT1 | -0.2211 | 2.3676 | 4.9564 | FALSE |
DT2 | RM1 | -2.6623 | -0.0735 | 2.5152 | FALSE |
DT2 | DT1 | -0.4564 | 2.1324 | 4.7211 | FALSE |
RM1 | DT1 | -0.3829 | 2.2059 | 4.7946 | FALSE |
NT Piano-Only Overall Summary Results
This subtask is evaluated in two different ways. In the first setup , a returned note is assumed correct if its onset is within +-50ms of a ref note and its F0 is within +- quarter tone of the corresponding reference note, ignoring the returned offset values. In the second setup, on top of the above requirements, a correct returned note is required to have an offset value within 20% of the ref notes duration around the ref note`s offset, or within 50ms whichever is larger. 6 piano recordings are evaluated separately for this subtask.
BW2 | BW3 | CB1 | CD3 | DT1 | DT2 | DT3 | EF1 | KD2 | RM1 | SB5 | SY4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ave. F-Measure Onset-Offset | 0.1537 | 0.2051 | 0.1850 | 0.1948 | 0.1505 | 0.1742 | 0.1745 | 0.2942 | 0.1719 | 0.0546 | 0.0423 | 0.1337 |
Ave. F-Measure Onset Only | 0.5588 | 0.6268 | 0.6635 | 0.4174 | 0.3201 | 0.3834 | 0.3813 | 0.8016 | 0.6778 | 0.2194 | 0.6802 | 0.4963 |
Ave. F-Measure Chroma | 0.1675 | 0.2176 | 0.2029 | 0.2341 | 0.1574 | 0.1749 | 0.1759 | 0.2737 | 0.1517 | 0.0624 | 0.0443 | 0.1413 |
Ave. F-Measure Onset Only Chroma | 0.5727 | 0.6393 | 0.6747 | 0.4940 | 0.3385 | 0.3914 | 0.3892 | 0.7347 | 0.6165 | 0.2391 | 0.6876 | 0.5233 |
Detailed Results
Precision | Recall | Ave. F-measure | Ave. Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW2 | 0.163 | 0.146 | 0.154 | 0.837 |
BW3 | 0.198 | 0.213 | 0.205 | 0.842 |
CB1 | 0.203 | 0.171 | 0.185 | 0.813 |
CD3 | 0.187 | 0.207 | 0.195 | 0.728 |
DT1 | 0.121 | 0.222 | 0.150 | 0.752 |
DT2 | 0.165 | 0.199 | 0.174 | 0.760 |
DT3 | 0.163 | 0.201 | 0.175 | 0.759 |
EF1 | 0.313 | 0.278 | 0.294 | 0.835 |
KD2 | 0.166 | 0.180 | 0.172 | 0.838 |
RM1 | 0.050 | 0.062 | 0.055 | 0.799 |
SB5 | 0.041 | 0.044 | 0.042 | 0.773 |
SY4 | 0.155 | 0.119 | 0.134 | 0.834 |
Detailed Chroma Results
Here, accuracy is assessed on chroma results (i.e. all F0's are mapped to a single octave before evaluating)
Precision | Recall | Ave. F-measure | Ave. Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW2 | 0.178 | 0.159 | 0.168 | 0.828 |
BW3 | 0.210 | 0.226 | 0.218 | 0.832 |
CB1 | 0.221 | 0.189 | 0.203 | 0.805 |
CD3 | 0.226 | 0.248 | 0.234 | 0.859 |
DT1 | 0.126 | 0.239 | 0.157 | 0.737 |
DT2 | 0.165 | 0.202 | 0.175 | 0.760 |
DT3 | 0.163 | 0.205 | 0.176 | 0.753 |
EF1 | 0.292 | 0.259 | 0.274 | 0.836 |
KD2 | 0.147 | 0.158 | 0.152 | 0.837 |
RM1 | 0.057 | 0.071 | 0.062 | 0.804 |
SB5 | 0.043 | 0.046 | 0.044 | 0.774 |
SY4 | 0.164 | 0.126 | 0.141 | 0.833 |
Results Based on Onset Only
Precision | Recall | Ave. F-measure | Ave. Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW2 | 0.590 | 0.534 | 0.559 | 0.558 |
BW3 | 0.602 | 0.655 | 0.627 | 0.583 |
CB1 | 0.700 | 0.636 | 0.664 | 0.566 |
CD3 | 0.422 | 0.430 | 0.417 | 0.555 |
DT1 | 0.253 | 0.508 | 0.320 | 0.553 |
DT2 | 0.353 | 0.461 | 0.383 | 0.554 |
DT3 | 0.347 | 0.460 | 0.381 | 0.555 |
EF1 | 0.845 | 0.764 | 0.802 | 0.618 |
KD2 | 0.659 | 0.701 | 0.678 | 0.594 |
RM1 | 0.202 | 0.244 | 0.219 | 0.555 |
SB5 | 0.640 | 0.728 | 0.680 | 0.408 |
SY4 | 0.584 | 0.437 | 0.496 | 0.552 |
Chroma Results Based on Onset Only
Precision | Recall | Ave. F-measure | Ave. Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BW2 | 0.605 | 0.547 | 0.573 | 0.559 |
BW3 | 0.614 | 0.668 | 0.639 | 0.582 |
CB1 | 0.712 | 0.646 | 0.675 | 0.562 |
CD3 | 0.506 | 0.506 | 0.494 | 0.546 |
DT1 | 0.267 | 0.538 | 0.339 | 0.518 |
DT2 | 0.360 | 0.472 | 0.391 | 0.534 |
DT3 | 0.354 | 0.470 | 0.389 | 0.533 |
EF1 | 0.775 | 0.700 | 0.735 | 0.615 |
KD2 | 0.601 | 0.636 | 0.616 | 0.591 |
RM1 | 0.220 | 0.266 | 0.239 | 0.537 |
SB5 | 0.646 | 0.736 | 0.688 | 0.409 |
SY4 | 0.616 | 0.461 | 0.523 | 0.346 |
Individual Results Files for Task 2
BW2= Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde
BW3= Emmanouil Benetos, Tillman Weyde
CB1= Chris Cannam, Emmanouil Benetos
CD3= Andrea Cogliati, Zhiyao Duan
DT1= Zhiyao Duan, David Temperley
DT2= Zhiyao Duan, David Temperley
DT3= Zhiyao Duan, David Temperley
EF1= Anders Elowsson, Anders Friberg
KD2= Karin Dressler
RM1= Daniel Recoskie, Richard Mann
SB5= Sebastian Böck
SY4= Li Su, Yi-Hsuan Yang