Difference between revisions of "2006:Score Following"

From MIREX Wiki
 
(Setting up structures)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
* Stephen Downie
 
* Stephen Downie
  
=== Context related issues in Score Following evaluation ===
+
=== Acceptable systems ===
  
 
==== Viewpoints ====
 
==== Viewpoints ====
Line 36: Line 36:
 
===== Arie Van Schutterhoef =====
 
===== Arie Van Schutterhoef =====
  
 +
=== Input/Output types ===
  
===== Fabio Vignoli =====
+
=== Issue of Training ===
====== Task related similarity ======
 
 
 
=== Objective statistics based upon album, artist and genre labels proposal ===
 
 
 
 
 
=== Subjective evaluation ===
 
 
 
 
 
==== Alternatives to rating on a scale ====
 
 
 
  
 +
=== Evaluation Metrics ===
  
 
== Related Papers ==
 
== Related Papers ==

Revision as of 11:29, 10 July 2006

Overview

This page is devoted to discussions of the evaluation of Score Following algorithms at MIREX 2006. Discussions have already begun on the https://mail.lis.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/mrx-com01 MIREX 06 "ScoreFollowing06" contest planning list] and will be briefly digested here. A full digest of the discussions is available to subscribers from the https://mail.lis.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/mrx-com01 MIREX 06 "ScoreFollowing06" contest planning archive].

As consensus is achieved on the planning list, a full proposal (Score Following Proposal) will be produced for the format of the evaluation, including pseudocode for the evaluation metric and suggested formats for submitted algorithms. A skeleton of proposal is already available on the Score Following Proposal page.

Moderators

  • Arshia Cont (University of California in San Diego (UCSD) and Ircam - Realtime Applications Team, France) - cont@ircam.fr

Introduction

Score Following is the real-time alignment of incoming music signal to the music score. The music signal can be symbolic (Midi Score Following) or Audio.

This page serves as a summary of the discussions held on the ScoreFollower06 mailing list and will eventually hold a final evaluation proposal for MIREX 2006.

Important threads on the discussion list

Contributors:

  • Christopher Raphael
  • Arshia Cont
  • Diemo Schwarz
  • George Litterst
  • Kris West
  • Arie Van Schuetterhoef
  • Michael Good
  • Stephen Downie

Acceptable systems

Viewpoints

Arshia Cont
Christopher Raphael
Diemo Schwarz
Arie Van Schutterhoef

Input/Output types

Issue of Training

Evaluation Metrics

Related Papers