Difference between revisions of "2005:Symbolic Key Finding Results"
From MIREX Wiki
(Created page with '==Introduction== '''Goal:''' The evaluation of key finding algorithms applied to MIDI files. Note: There is a close relationship (same musical datasets) between this contest and…') |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Dataset:''' 1,252 MIDI files, 3.62 Megabytes | '''Dataset:''' 1,252 MIDI files, 3.62 Megabytes | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Result== | ||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|1 | |1 | ||
| − | |Temperley, D. | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/temperley.pdf Temperley, D.] |
|1143.8 | |1143.8 | ||
|91.4% | |91.4% | ||
| Line 31: | Line 33: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|2 | |2 | ||
| − | |Zhu, Y. | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/zhu2.pdf Zhu, Y.] |
|1075.2 | |1075.2 | ||
|85.9% | |85.9% | ||
| Line 43: | Line 45: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|3 | |3 | ||
| − | |Rizo & Iñesta | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/rizo.pdf Rizo & Iñesta] |
|982.4 | |982.4 | ||
|78.5% | |78.5% | ||
| Line 67: | Line 69: | ||
|---- | |---- | ||
|5 | |5 | ||
| − | |Mardirossian & Chew | + | |[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/mardirossian.pdf Mardirossian & Chew] |
|934.0 | |934.0 | ||
|74.6% | |74.6% | ||
Revision as of 15:52, 31 July 2010
Introduction
Goal: The evaluation of key finding algorithms applied to MIDI files. Note: There is a close relationship (same musical datasets) between this contest and the Audio Key Finding contest. Here is a link to the Audio Key Finding results.
Dataset: 1,252 MIDI files, 3.62 Megabytes
Result
| Rank | Participant | Total Score | Percentage Score | Correct Keys | Perfect 5th Errors | Relative Major/Minor Errors | Parallel Major/Minor Errors | Other Errors | Runtime (s) | Machine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Temperley, D. | 1143.8 | 91.4% | 1127 | 15 | 27 | 6 | 77 | 91 | B 0 |
| 2 | Zhu, Y. | 1075.2 | 85.9% | 1041 | 35 | 47 | 13 | 116 | ? (See note) | R |
| 3 | Rizo & Iñesta | 982.4 | 78.5% | 913 | 81 | 87 | 14 | 157 | 631 | B 0 |
| 4 | Ehmann, A. | 947.4 | 75.7% | 851 | 160 | 44 | 16 | 181 | 5670 | G |
| 5 | Mardirossian & Chew | 934.0 | 74.6% | 799 | 210 | 80 | 30 | 133 | 471 | B 0 |
Note: Runtime undetermined due to system hang.
