2008:Query by Singing/Humming - Revision history

Mortenwendelboe at 10:14, 29 August 2008

2008-08-29T10:14:11Z

2008-08-23T06:41:28Z

‎Leiwang's Comments(August 22, 2008)

2008-08-23T06:41:12Z

‎Leiwang's Comments

2008-08-23T06:40:22Z

‎Matti's Comments (August 22, 2008)

2008-08-23T06:37:45Z

‎Matti's Comments (August 22, 2008)

2008-08-23T03:20:20Z

add participant

2008-08-22T08:25:56Z

2008-08-22T06:46:43Z

2008-08-22T06:44:53Z

2008-08-22T06:44:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:14, 29 August 2008
Line 121:		Line 121:
	== Thinkit's query contribution ==		== Thinkit's query contribution ==
	ThinkIT QBH corpus is available at [http://159.226.60.224/en/Thinkit.QBH.corpus.rar TITcorpus]. (355 audio files along with 106 MIDI files)		ThinkIT QBH corpus is available at [http://159.226.60.224/en/Thinkit.QBH.corpus.rar TITcorpus]. (355 audio files along with 106 MIDI files)
		+
		+	== Morten's Comments(August 29, 2008) ==
		+	Where can we find the cleaned version of Essen Database? At http://www.esac-data.org/ I can find all the files but how is the "cleaned version" defined? It would be nice if someone could provide the cleaned version in MIDI.

@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 Hi everyone. I noticed that the submission format just changed for the pitch tracking part from <onset> <pitch> format to <frame_time> <pitch> where frame times are on a discrete time grid. However, I already submitted my codes with the previous format and also my method requires note onsets instead of frame-wise pitch tracks. I'd prefer the <onset> <pitch> format, since it allows using both note and pitch track based approaches. Anyhow, my submitted code will run as it is and I hope that this is no problem for the evaluation.
-== Leiwang's Comments(August 22, 2008) ==
+== Leiwang's Comments(August 23, 2008) ==
 Hi, everyone. I found that the evaluation method this year is "hit in the top 10". It is quite different from the previous. Do we need additional methods for evaluation? such as "top 1 hit", "top 3 hit" or "MRR"?
 == Thinkit's query contribution ==
 ThinkIT QBH corpus is available at [http://159.226.60.224/en/Thinkit.QBH.corpus.rar TITcorpus]. (355 audio files along with 106 MIDI files)

@@ Line 116: / Line 116: @@
 Hi everyone. I noticed that the submission format just changed for the pitch tracking part from <onset> <pitch> format to <frame_time> <pitch> where frame times are on a discrete time grid. However, I already submitted my codes with the previous format and also my method requires note onsets instead of frame-wise pitch tracks. I'd prefer the <onset> <pitch> format, since it allows using both note and pitch track based approaches. Anyhow, my submitted code will run as it is and I hope that this is no problem for the evaluation.
-== Leiwang's Comments ==
+== Leiwang's Comments(August 22, 2008) ==
 Hi, everyone. I found that the evaluation method this year is "hit in the top 10". It is quite different from the previous. Do we need additional methods for evaluation? such as "top 1 hit", "top 3 hit" or "MRR"?
 == Thinkit's query contribution ==
 ThinkIT QBH corpus is available at [http://159.226.60.224/en/Thinkit.QBH.corpus.rar TITcorpus]. (355 audio files along with 106 MIDI files)

@@ Line 115: / Line 115: @@
 == Matti's Comments (August 22, 2008) ==
 Hi everyone. I noticed that the submission format just changed for the pitch tracking part from <onset> <pitch> format to <frame_time> <pitch> where frame times are on a discrete time grid. However, I already submitted my codes with the previous format and also my method requires note onsets instead of frame-wise pitch tracks. I'd prefer the <onset> <pitch> format, since it allows using both note and pitch track based approaches. Anyhow, my submitted code will run as it is and I hope that this is no problem for the evaluation.
 == Leiwang's Comments ==

@@ Line 115: / Line 115: @@
 == Matti's Comments (August 22, 2008) ==
 Hi everyone. I noticed that the submission format just changed for the pitch tracking part from <onset> <pitch> format to <frame_time> <pitch> where frame times are on a discrete time grid. However, I already submitted my codes with the previous format and also my method requires note onsets instead of frame-wise pitch tracks. I'd prefer the <onset> <pitch> format, since it allows using both note and pitch track based approaches. Anyhow, my submitted code will run as it is and I hope that this is no problem for the evaluation.
 == Thinkit's query contribution ==
 ThinkIT QBH corpus is available at [http://159.226.60.224/en/Thinkit.QBH.corpus.rar TITcorpus]. (355 audio files along with 106 MIDI files)

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
   query_00001: 00025 01003 02200 ...
   query_00002: 01547 02313 07653 ...
   query_00003: 03142 00320 00973 ...
@@ Line 92: / Line 91: @@
 If you think there is a slight chance that you might want to participate, please add your name and e-mail address to this list
-* Liang-Yu Davidson Chen (davidson833 at mirlab dot org)
+* Liang-Yu Davidson Chen and Jyh-Shing Roger Jang (National Tsing Hua University), davidson833 at mirlab dot org, jang at cs dot nthu dot edu dot tw
 * Lei Wang (leiwang.mir at gmail dot com)
 * Xiao Wu (xwu2006 at gmail dot com)

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 To make algorithms able to share intermediate steps, participants are encouraged to submit separate tracker and matcher modules instead of integrated ones, which is according to Rainer Typke's suggestion. So trackers and matchers from different submissions could work together with the same pre-defined interface and thus for us it's possible to find the best combination.
-== Interface I ==
+== Interface I: Breakdown Version ==
 The following was based on the suggestion by Xiao Wu last year with some modifications.
@@ Line 81: / Line 81: @@
   ...
-== Interface II ==
+== Interface II: Integrated Version ==
 If you want to pack everything together, the calling format should be much simpler:

@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 If you want to pack everything together, the calling format should be much simpler:
-  qbshMainProgram %midi.list% %wave.list% %resultFile% %dir_workspace_root%
+  qbshMainProgram %dbMidi.list% %queryWave.list% %resultFile% %dir_workspace_root%
 You can use %dir_workspace_root% to store any temporary indexing/database structures. The result file should have the same format as mentioned previously.