2006:Audio Beat Tracking - Revision history

Karishma: /* References */

2010-05-20T19:34:32Z

‎References

IMIRSELBot: Robot: Automated text replacement (-\[\[([A-Z]) +[[2006:\1)

2010-05-13T18:00:03Z

Robot: Automated text replacement (-\[\[([A-Z]) +[[2006:\1)

Admin: /* Results */

2007-08-02T18:52:24Z

‎Results

Admin: /* Results */

2007-08-02T18:48:13Z

‎Results

Admin: /* Results */

2007-08-02T18:47:17Z

‎Results

Xiao: /* Proposers */

2006-10-06T22:47:18Z

‎Proposers

Xiao: /* Description */

2006-10-06T22:46:58Z

‎Description

Xiao: /* Description */

2006-10-06T22:43:35Z

‎Description

Xiao: /* Description */

2006-10-06T22:27:42Z

‎Description

Admin at 21:27, 16 August 2006

2006-08-16T21:27:01Z

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 # Masataka Goto and Yoichi Muraoka. Issues in evaluating beat tracking systems. In Working Notes of IJCAI-97 Workshop on Issues in AI and Music - Evaluation and Assessment, pages 9┬¡16, 1997 [http://staff.aist.go.jp/m.goto/PAPER/AIM97.300dpi.ps postscript]
 # McKinney, M.F. and Moelants, D. (2004), Deviations from the resonance theory of tempo induction, Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology, Graz. [http://gewi.kfunigraz.ac.at/~cim04/CIM04_paper_pdf/McKinney_Moelants_CIM04_proceedings_t.pdf pdf]
-# Moelants, D. and McKinney, M.F. (2004), Tempo perception and musical content: What makes a piece slow, fast, or temporally ambiguous? International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition, Evanston, IL. [http://www.northwestern.edu/icmpc/proceedings/ICMPC8/PDF/AUTHOR/MP040237.PDF pdf]
+# Moelants, D. and McKinney, M.F. (2004), Tempo perception and musical content: What makes a piece slow, fast, or temporally ambiguous? International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition, Evanston, IL. [http://www.northwestern.edu/icmpc/proceedings/ICMPC8/PDF/AUTHOR/MP040237.pdf pdf]
 == Comments ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Results ==
-Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page.
+Results are on [[2006:Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page.
 '''NOTE:''' Due to an evaluation error, the results of the Audio Beat Tracking task have been updated as of 17 July 2007, and differ from those presented at ISMIR 2006.
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 == Description ==
-The aim of the automatic beat tracking task is to track each beat locations in a collection of sound files. Unlike the [[Audio Tempo Extraction]] task, which aim is to detect tempi for each file, the beat tracking task aims at detecting all beat locations in recordings. The algorithms will be evaluated in terms of their accuracy in predicting beat locations annotated by a group of listeners.
+The aim of the automatic beat tracking task is to track each beat locations in a collection of sound files. Unlike the [[2006:Audio Tempo Extraction]] task, which aim is to detect tempi for each file, the beat tracking task aims at detecting all beat locations in recordings. The algorithms will be evaluated in terms of their accuracy in predicting beat locations annotated by a group of listeners.
 === Input data ===
@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 == Evaluation Database ==
-A collection of 160 musical exerpts will be used for the evaluation procedure, the same collection used for the [[Audio Tempo Extraction]] contest. Each recording has been annotated by 40 different listeners (39 in a few cases). The annotation procedures were described in [2] and [3].
+A collection of 160 musical exerpts will be used for the evaluation procedure, the same collection used for the [[2006:Audio Tempo Extraction]] contest. Each recording has been annotated by 40 different listeners (39 in a few cases). The annotation procedures were described in [2] and [3].
 excerpts will be provided for training to the participant, and the remaining 140 excerpts, novel to all participants, will be used for the contest.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Results ==
-Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page. Due to an evaluation error, the results of the Audio Beat Tracking task have been updated as of 17 July 2007, and differ from those presented at ISMIR 2006.
+Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page.
 == Proposers ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Results ==
-Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page. Due to an evaluation error, the results of the Audio Beat Tracking task have been updated as of 17 July 2007.
+Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page. Due to an evaluation error, the results of the Audio Beat Tracking task have been updated as of 17 July 2007, and differ from those presented at ISMIR 2006.
 == Proposers ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Results ==
-Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page.
+Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page. Due to an evaluation error, the results of the Audio Beat Tracking task have been updated as of 17 July 2007.
 == Proposers ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:47, 6 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Results ==
		+
		+	Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page.
		+
	== Proposers ==		== Proposers ==

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 == Description ==
-The aim of the automatic beat tracking task is to track each beat locations in a collection of sound files. Unlike the [[Audio Tempo Extraction]] task, which aim is to detect tempi for each file, the beat tracking task aims at detecting all beat locations in recordings. The algorithms will be evaluated in terms of their accuracy in predicting beat locations annotated by a group of listeners. Results are in [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page.
+The aim of the automatic beat tracking task is to track each beat locations in a collection of sound files. Unlike the [[Audio Tempo Extraction]] task, which aim is to detect tempi for each file, the beat tracking task aims at detecting all beat locations in recordings. The algorithms will be evaluated in terms of their accuracy in predicting beat locations annotated by a group of listeners. Results are on [[Audio Beat Tracking Results]] page.
 === Input data ===

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:27, 16 August 2006
Line 90:		Line 90:

	Paul's comments: as noted off-list by Matthew Davies, Goto proposed evaluation metrics to evaluate beat tracking algorithms accuracy [1] are somewhat difficult to apply to all beat tracking algorithms without modifications, since they assume the algorithms stabilise on a robust tempo value only after 45 seconds. Even after removing this 45s constraint, the four different metrics obtained by this method are somewhat difficult to interpret.		Paul's comments: as noted off-list by Matthew Davies, Goto proposed evaluation metrics to evaluate beat tracking algorithms accuracy [1] are somewhat difficult to apply to all beat tracking algorithms without modifications, since they assume the algorithms stabilise on a robust tempo value only after 45 seconds. Even after removing this 45s constraint, the four different metrics obtained by this method are somewhat difficult to interpret.
		+
		+	==Practice Data==
		+	You can find it here:
		+
		+	https://www.music-ir.org/evaluation/MIREX/data/2006/beat/
		+
		+	User: beattrack Password: b34trx
		+
		+	https://www.music-ir.org/evaluation/MIREX/data/2006/tempo/
		+
		+	User: tempo Password: t3mp0
		+
		+	Data has been uploaded in both .tgz and .zip format.