2005:Audio Key Finding Results - Revision history

Singh14: /* Results */

2010-08-02T22:34:20Z

‎Results

Show changes

Singh14 at 13:34, 30 July 2010

2010-07-30T13:34:21Z

Singh14 at 22:13, 29 July 2010

2010-07-29T22:13:42Z

Singh14 at 22:11, 29 July 2010

2010-07-29T22:11:05Z

Singh14 at 21:46, 29 July 2010

2010-07-29T21:46:42Z

Singh14 at 21:41, 29 July 2010

2010-07-29T21:41:14Z

Singh14 at 21:39, 29 July 2010

2010-07-29T21:39:46Z

Singh14 at 21:38, 29 July 2010

2010-07-29T21:38:40Z

Singh14 at 21:30, 29 July 2010

2010-07-29T21:30:14Z

Singh14: Created page with '{| |Rank |Participant |Composite Percentage Score |Total Score |Percentage Score |Correct Keys |Perfect 5th Errors |Relative Major/Minor Errors |Parallel |---- |Major/Minor Error…'

2010-07-29T21:27:41Z

Created page with '{| |Rank |Participant |Composite Percentage Score |Total Score |Percentage Score |Correct Keys |Perfect 5th Errors |Relative Major/Minor Errors |Parallel |---- |Major/Minor Error…'

New page

{|
|Rank
|Participant
|Composite Percentage Score
|Total Score
|Percentage Score
|Correct Keys
|Perfect 5th Errors
|Relative Major/Minor Errors
|Parallel
|----
|Major/Minor Errors
|Other Errors
|Runtime (s)
|Machine
|----
|w
|t
|w
|t
|w
|t
|w
|t
|w
|t
|w
|t
|w
|t
|w
|t
|
|----
|1
|?zmirli, Ö.
|89.55%
|1188.8
|1122.9
|89.4%
|89.7%
|1086
|1089
|36
|42
|38
|31
|17
|18
|75
|72
|15284
|16354
|Y
|----
|2
|Purwins & Blankertz
|89.00%
|1122.4
|1106.5
|89.6%
|88.4%
|1090
|1060
|44
|72
|24
|21
|16
|21
|78
|78
|45003
|44232
|R
|----
|3
|Gómez, E. (start)
|86.05%
|1081.9
|1072.9
|86.4%
|85.7%
|1048
|1034
|35
|44
|38
|43
|25
|20
|106
|111
|1560
|1531
|B 0
|----
|4
|Gómez, E. (global)
|85.90%
|1076.1
|1073.8
|86.0%
|85.8%
|1019
|1015
|69
|73
|62
|59
|20
|23
|82
|82
|2041
|1971
|B 0
|----
|5
|Pauws, S.
|85.00%
|1055.1
|1072.8
|84.3%
|85.7%
|1019
|1034
|20
|23
|67
|69
|30
|33
|116
|93
|503
|507
|G
|----
|6
|Zhu, Y.
|83.25%
|1066.2
|1017.7
|85.2%
|81.3%
|1034
|964
|38
|66
|28
|47
|24
|33
|128
|142
|25233
|24039
|Y
|----
|7
|Chuan & Chew
|79.10%
|1002.3
|977.3
|80.1%
|78.1%
|937
|905
|83
|95
|66
|68
|20
|22
|146
|162
|3299
|3468
|R
|----
|}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Goal:''' The evaluation of key finding algorithms applied to audio sound files
+==Introduction==
-'''Dataset:''' 1,252 audio files synthesized from MIDI Note: There is a close relationship (same musical datasets) between this contest and the Symbolic Key Finding contest. Here is a link to the Symbolic Key Finding results.
+===Goal===
 Two databases used: Winamp synthesized audio (w) and Timidity with Fusion soundfonts synthesized audio (t). Each database is approximately 3.1 gigabytes for a total of 6.2 gigabytes of audio files.
 The composite score is calculated by averaging the Winamp and Timidity scores.
 {| border="1" cellspacing="0"
 |- style="background: yellow;"

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 29 July 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	'''Goal:''' The evaluation of key finding algorithms applied to audio sound files
		+
		+	'''Dataset:''' 1,252 audio files synthesized from MIDI Note: There is a close relationship (same musical datasets) between this contest and the Symbolic Key Finding contest. Here is a link to the Symbolic Key Finding results.
		+
		+	Two databases used: Winamp synthesized audio (w) and Timidity with Fusion soundfonts synthesized audio (t). Each database is approximately 3.1 gigabytes for a total of 6.2 gigabytes of audio files.
		+
		+	The composite score is calculated by averaging the Winamp and Timidity scores.
		+	<br>
		+
	{\| border="1" cellspacing="0"		{\| border="1" cellspacing="0"
	\|- style="background: yellow;"		\|- style="background: yellow;"

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 !colspan="2" | Perfect 5th Errors
 !colspan="2" | Relative Major/Minor Errors
-!colspan="2" | Parallel
+!colspan="2" | Parallel Major/Minor Errors
 !colspan="2" | Other Errors
 !colspan="2" | Runtime (s)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{| border="1"
+{| border="1" cellspacing="0"
 |- style="background: yellow;"
 !Rank
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 !colspan="2" | Major/Minor Errors
 !colspan="2" | Other Errors
-!Runtime (s)
+!colspan="2" | Runtime (s)
 !Machine
 |----

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 !Participant
 !Composite Percentage Score
-!Total Score
+!colspan="2" | Total Score
-!Percentage Score
+!colspan="2" | Percentage Score
-!Correct Keys
+!colspan="2" | Correct Keys
-!Perfect 5th Errors
+!colspan="2" | Perfect 5th Errors
-!Relative Major/Minor Errors
+!colspan="2" | Relative Major/Minor Errors
-!Parallel
+!colspan="2" | Parallel
-!Major/Minor Errors
+!colspan="2" | Major/Minor Errors
-!Other Errors
+!colspan="2" | Other Errors
 !Runtime (s)
 !Machine

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 |----
 |1
-|Izmirli, Ö.
+|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/izmirli.pdf Izmirli, Ö. ]
 |89.55%
 |1188.8
@@ Line 57: / Line 57: @@
 |----
 |2
-|Purwins &amp; Blankertz
+|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/purwins.pdf Purwins &amp; Blankertz ]
 |89.00%
 |1122.4
@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 |----
 |3
-|Gómez, E. (start)
+|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/gomez.pdf Gómez, E. (start)]
 |86.05%
 |1081.9
@@ Line 99: / Line 99: @@
 |----
 |4
-|Gómez, E. (global)
+|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/gomez.pdf Gómez, E. (global)]
 |85.90%
 |1076.1
@@ Line 120: / Line 120: @@
 |----
 |5
-|Pauws, S.
+|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/pauws.pdf Pauws, S. ]
 |85.00%
 |1055.1
@@ Line 141: / Line 141: @@
 |----
 |6
-|Zhu, Y.
+|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/zhu.pdf Zhu, Y.]
 |83.25%
 |1066.2
@@ Line 162: / Line 162: @@
 |----
 |7
-|Chuan &amp; Chew
+|[https://www.music-ir.org/mirex/abstracts/2005/chuan.pdf Chuan &amp; Chew]
 |79.10%
 |1002.3